您的当前位置:首页 >綜合 >【】 正文

【】

时间:2024-11-24 08:20:24 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合

核心提示

Here's an idea: Instead of waking up the regular way, why not let an orgasm rouse you from peaceful

Here's an idea: Instead of waking up the regular way, why not let an orgasm rouse you from peaceful slumber?

That's the premise behind the Little Rooster S, the inexplicable vibrator-alarm clock hybrid for women.  。

Mashable ImageCredit: little rooster 。

Basically, a user wears the device inside a pair of underwear, but outside the body. At the specified time, the device will begin to vibrate, first on a low setting before it gradually increases to the wearer's selected level of intensity. There are 30 levels to choose from, and a spokesperson from the company claims the device is virtually silent through 27.。

SEE ALSO:There's now an eggplant-shaped vibrator because emoji are super sexy。

Introduced back in 2011, the original Little Rooster garnered a ton of media attention and even made an appearance on 。 Introduced back in 2011, the original Little Rooster garnered a ton of media attention and even made an appearance on 。Jimmy Kimmel Live。

Mashable Games

-- oddly enough -- via guest Howie Mandel. In the last six months, however, the original Little Rooster has been out of stock. Now the company is back with the Little Rooster S, an updated model with a few new features. 。

Per a spokesperson for the company, the new pink model runs on a more powerful motor and features a travel lock. The update also did away with a less-than-discrete feature on the original model, which started beeping after 20 minutes of use.。Mashable After DarkWant more sex and dating stories in your inbox?Mashable After DarkWant more sex and dating stories in your inbox?Sign up for Mashable's new weekly After Dark newsletter. 。

By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。

Thanks for signing up!。

The Little Rooster S doesn't come cheap-- it'll cost £69.00 (or about $77.70) to try it yourself.。

But the question remains: Does the device actually deliver on its promises to both wake you up and get you off? A 2013 "Oh Joy Sex Toy" review of the original Little Rooster wrote that though you "hardly even notice it" once it's in place, the vibrations weren't strong enough for the writer's preference. All in all, the reviewer labelled it "a cute novelty item," but not an essential buy.。But over at  。

But over at。

Cosmopolitan。

, the reviewer seemed pretty into her new alarm clock, writing that "you will never feel guilty about hitting the snooze button. Ever." 。

As for the Little Rooster S and its new motor, only adventurous buyers will know how it stands up against other sex toys. 。[H/T: Daily Mail] 。TopicsSex Toys 。