时间:2025-10-19 09:56:25 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
Perhaps you've heard: Alien panic is sweeping the internet. You can't go more than a week or two wit
Perhaps you've heard: Alien panic is sweeping the internet.
You can't go more than a week or two without a new and ridiculous story about life maybe being out there in the universe going viral, spawning breathless coverage and debunks alike. It's exhausting.
This week, all that alien panic is swirling around a story citing a Harvard astronomer claiming that the first interstellar asteroid or comet ever discovered named 'Oumuamua might actually have been sent by aliens from distant space. It's sensational! It's perfect for the internet! It's also something you should be totally skeptical of.
Start with the motto "It's never aliens," and work back from there. But that's easier said than done.
Here are just a few things to think about the next time you're trying to spot an alien panic (or aliens) on the internet:
This is the big one. Always question where a story is coming from — with aliens and with anything else.
In the case of the interstellar asteroid piece going around this week the story is based on the conjectures of one Harvard researcher, who gave NBC a quote speculating that the asteroid might be an alien ship sailing on the radiation of our sun.
The piece was pegged to a new study that hasn't yet been peer-reviewed, which briefly mentions the idea that maybe aliens could have sent the asteroid into the far-reaches of space based on how it's moving.
Effectively, all of this alien panic coverage was stirred up from one quote from one researcher. So here's a good rule of thumb: Offhand comments do not new stories make.
Now, if the piece announcing aliens was heavily sourced to more than one astronomer and had plenty of peer-reviewed evidence behind it, things might be different.
You can learn a lot about a story based on the way it's written. As for a good story about aliens, you want it to have more than one source, or at the very least, plenty of context.
For example, a quick search shows that scientists actually kept an ear out for any radio signals being sent by 'Oumuamua when it passed through the solar system last year. However, they didn't find anything. That's the kind of context that needs to be in any news story about this particular finding.
SEE ALSO:It's not aliens. It's never aliens. Stop saying it's aliens.Do a quick Google search to figure out exactly what's being said about the story. If you find a debunk -- of which there are many for 'Oumuamua -- that's a pretty good indication that perhaps the more breathless takes aren't what they seem.
Also, always be wary of appeals to authority in journalism. If the story (and headline) rely heavily on just one researcher from a high-profile institution, then the story probably isn't news at all.
While how the story is written is the most important tool you can use to judge an alien news story, a look at which publication is running the story can also help you evaluate whether the news is something to get excited about.
Ask whether the publication has a history of covering science in a reliable way. (Look to places like The Verge, Ars Technica, big newspapers like the New York Timesand Washington Post, The Atlantic, and, yes, Mashable for really consistently good science coverage.)
It's probably best not to trust a tabloid when it comes to science writing as a rule. If science-minded publications aren't writing about this, or if they're more skeptical, be skeptical as well.
You can figure out a lot about an alien story if you know why it's being published when it is.
NASA is the master of inducing alien panic with obvious timing. Usually, the space agency will announce a press conference for either 1 p.m. ET on a Wednesday or 2 p.m. ET on a Thursday under the auspices of some exciting announcement related to "life in the solar system," or some other tantalizing news nugget.
While the agency won't give away what the actual news is, the savvy observer can actually figure out a bit about the story.
Via GiphyIf the press conference is announced for one of those specific times, it will correspond with an embargoed study being released in one of two major science journals — either Scienceor Nature. (We know this because journalists have embargoed access to these journals each week.)
In all likelihood, that means the story will be compelling, but probably not definitive proof of alien life.
The truth is, if you're hoping for some kind of "we've found little green men announcement," then the White House will almost definitely be involved. Cool incremental science stuff about microbial life out there in the universe, however, will likely come through the journals and NASA.
I don't want to be a buzzkill. It's fun to think about aliens. It's great to wonder about whether we're alone in the universe.
But, at least for now, it's just a thought experiment. Just remember one thing: It's never aliens ... until it is.
Uber's $100M settlement over drivers as contractors may not be enough2025-10-19 09:34
長約非“免死金牌” 負麵接連被曝李鐵下課已成定局2025-10-19 08:17
2021普斯卡什獎候選:希克天外飛仙 拉梅拉插花腳2025-10-19 08:13
朗尼克引援又有新動向 欲3300萬挖萊比錫舊部鐵腰2025-10-19 08:13
Slack goes down again, prompting anxiety everywhere2025-10-19 08:03
迷惑!桑喬單刀破門前 跟跑的拉什福德始終在越位位置2025-10-19 07:49
拉莫斯 :我支持梅西贏得金球獎 他是獨一無二的2025-10-19 07:38
亞洲女足諸強忙熱身備戰亞洲杯 中國女足尚未組隊2025-10-19 07:20
Mall builds real2025-10-19 07:19
弗賴堡新晉國腳示好拜仁 :想為德甲最好球隊效力2025-10-19 07:13
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2025-10-19 09:45
BTV :國安正與高薪國腳談年薪減半 大環境下他們沒有選擇2025-10-19 09:21
足協 :年底合同到期球員需續約或簽補充協議2025-10-19 09:15
卡裏克:未能贏下比賽非常失望 朗尼克沒參與布陣2025-10-19 09:09
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-10-19 08:48
巴薩低迷3星爆發!庫鳥造點+秀倒鉤 信心找到了?2025-10-19 08:41
巴黎開1700萬年薪誘維尼修斯 報複皇馬挖角姆巴佩2025-10-19 08:36
主帥談武磊失單刀 :隻是運氣問題 應該繼續信任他2025-10-19 08:22
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-10-19 07:44
薩裏:那不勒斯無愧意甲最強 爭冠的球隊都不夠看2025-10-19 07:41