时间:2025-04-03 05:42:02 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
Facebook took a teeny step forward on its tightrope walk between helping people vote in 2020 and not
Facebook took a teeny step forward on its tightrope walk between helping people vote in 2020 and not pissing off President Donald Trump.
In a livestreamed video Friday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg shared new policies that he claims will help people cast their ballots in the 2020 elections. This work falls to Facebook because misinformation about voting spreads on its social networks, including Instagram and WhatsApp, like wildfire. Standing for a cause like "voting" also seems like a neutral issue that would generate public goodwill — or so one would think.
Zuckerberg announced that the company would add a link to "authoritative information" on all Facebook and Instagram posts having to do with voting. That "information" will consist of a link to Facebook's new Voting Information Center. It's a portal with information about registering to vote and polling places, as well as resources from election officials.
The announcement is loaded because Trump used Facebook to spread misinformation about voting, and the company did nothing about it.
In a carefully worded statement, Zuckerberg said he wanted to give users solid information about voting, but didn't want to judge the content of posts on the topic. He explicitly specified that the policy will affect posts from politicians — presumably, including Trump.
"We are adopting a policy of attaching a link to our Voting Information Center for posts that discuss voting, including from politicians," Zuckerberg wrote. "This isn't a judgement of whether the posts themselves are accurate, but we want people to have access to authoritative information either way."
In May, Trump tweeted about the supposed dangers of absentee voting, claiming it would lead to a "rigged election."
Currently, many states are adopting or moving to broaden mail-in voting, so that people can vote without fear of contracting coronavirus. Trump said higher voter turnout favors Democratic candidates — so it makes sense that undermining absentee voting would work in the president's favor in November.
The president's unfounded absentee voting alarmism did not go unnoticed.
Twitter added a label to his tweet, which linked out to articles that showed there is no evidence that mail-in voting leads to fraud. It also flagged another Trump tweet that glorified violence against protesters.
The president railed against "censorship" and even signed an executive order pressuring Congress to revoke key legal protections for social media companies.
Twitter took at least some action. Facebook, on the other hand, left the posts up without any labels.
Despite Facebook's own policies against voter suppression, it defended the decision by describing the president's posts as "valid debate." This is itself a form of voter misinformation, since there is no factual debate about the security of absentee voting, and claiming there is confuses the issue and undermines the public's faith in the electoral process.
Facebook's moves seem to have helped it skirt the president's ire. Trump briefly ran attack ads on Facebook against Twitter and Snapchat — which announced it would no longer promote the president's channel in its Discover platform — for "censoring" him.
Trump ran no such ads against Facebook.
However, Facebook saw major backlash this week for its continued weaksauce response to Trump's many inflammatory claims about voting, protesters, immigrants, and more. Companies including Ben & Jerry's and Verizon signed on to a July ads boycott, suggested by several non-profit organizations. The NAACP pointed to the spread of misinformation and the undermining of democracy as one of the reasons for the boycott.
Tweet may have been deleted
Now, days before the July boycott is set to begin, Facebook gets to publicize small changes without fundamentally altering its business model, which in part relies on high engagement from many Trump supporters.
In addition to the links to the Voter Information Center, Facebook said it would add a label to posts that violate its policies (such as hate speech) if they're newsworthy (i.e., if they're from Trump).
An intentionally non-judgmental link to "more information" is basically the mildest form of fact-checking Facebook can do. But it's at least — ever so slightly — better than its previous policy of doing nothing.
TopicsFacebookSocial MediaDonald TrumpElectionsPolitics
Donald Trump's tangled web of Russian influence2025-04-03 05:39
This is the baby photo of three stars forming 750 light2025-04-03 05:22
Uber is making its own debit cards2025-04-03 05:21
Looks like Hillary Clinton might be getting campaign help from Jay2025-04-03 04:57
Carlos Beltran made a very interesting hair choice2025-04-03 04:56
No facepaint required: 9 insanely easy makeup2025-04-03 04:51
Facebook's livestream had one big advantage over everybody else2025-04-03 04:44
Pokémon isn't dead, it's back as zombie burgers for Halloween2025-04-03 04:11
Early Apple2025-04-03 03:28
These connected electric bicycles are set to run on Singapore's roads by 20172025-04-03 03:11
We asked linguists if Donald Trump speaks like that on purpose2025-04-03 05:18
Get your spoonful of banter with Gilmore Girls flavored ice cream2025-04-03 05:17
Lady Gaga and Mark Ronson clap back at Patrick Carney's trash talk2025-04-03 05:08
Facebook's livestream had one big advantage over everybody else2025-04-03 04:28
Felix the cat just raised £5000 for charity because she's the hero we all need2025-04-03 04:12
Is Airbnb the reason renters can't find an affordable place to live in Sydney?2025-04-03 04:10
'Doctor Strange' clip: Benedict Cumberbatch tries out his spells in battle2025-04-03 04:05
After the Dyn attack, Australia needs to look closely at its smart devices2025-04-03 03:59
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2025-04-03 03:33
Hit Korean movie 'Sunny' getting U.S. remake from producer Brett Ratner (Exclusive)2025-04-03 03:32