时间:2025-02-28 20:25:56 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Here's what 'Game of Thrones' actors get up to between takes2025-02-28 19:57
Dan Levy announces 'Schitt's Creek' to end with sixth and final season2025-02-28 19:40
The trans meme community on Reddit is about so much more than jokes2025-02-28 19:24
Microsoft takes a stand against corporate April Fools' jokes2025-02-28 18:35
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2025-02-28 18:35
Microsoft takes a stand against corporate April Fools' jokes2025-02-28 18:19
5 bizarre facts about Elizabeth Holmes 'The Inventor' left out2025-02-28 18:15
People still fear self2025-02-28 17:52
Satisfy your Olympics withdrawals with Nike's latest app2025-02-28 17:50
AOC obliterates claim that fighting climate change is 'elitist' in stirring speech2025-02-28 17:42
Uber's $100M settlement over drivers as contractors may not be enough2025-02-28 20:24
5 bizarre facts about Elizabeth Holmes 'The Inventor' left out2025-02-28 20:01
'Us' review roundup: Scarier than 'Get Out,' led by Lupita Nyong'o2025-02-28 19:55
Microsoft takes a stand against corporate April Fools' jokes2025-02-28 19:35
Uber's $100M settlement over drivers as contractors may not be enough2025-02-28 19:24
The viral 'Trashtag Challenge' encourages people to clean up litter2025-02-28 19:01
5 bizarre facts about Elizabeth Holmes 'The Inventor' left out2025-02-28 18:47
The 8 best funny horror movies for the easily spooked2025-02-28 18:38
Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news2025-02-28 18:28
5 bizarre facts about Elizabeth Holmes 'The Inventor' left out2025-02-28 17:40