时间:2025-09-19 02:37:07 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
J.K. Rowling makes 'Harry Potter' joke about Olympics event2025-09-19 02:35
Nissan buys controlling share in Mitsubishi for $2.1 billion2025-09-19 02:23
Where Americans are traveling in Europe this summer2025-09-19 02:00
Ancient mega tsunamis on Mars are newest clues to past life2025-09-19 01:52
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2025-09-19 01:43
Drew Barrymore, Pitbull help kick off Chelsea Handler's Netflix talk show2025-09-19 01:34
Smile for the world’s first automated selfie stick2025-09-19 00:27
Mother's voice lights up kids' brains2025-09-19 00:09
Metallica to seek and destroy your eardrums with new album this fall2025-09-19 00:03
A new code of conduct to protect animals from drones2025-09-18 23:59
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2025-09-19 02:08
Girl tries to eat corn from a power drill, rips out hair instead2025-09-19 02:01
Scorched remains: Haunting images from a city destroyed by wildfire2025-09-19 01:58
A new code of conduct to protect animals from drones2025-09-19 01:54
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2025-09-19 01:39
Twitter is hiring in Singapore for its first data science team outside the U.S.2025-09-19 01:38
Opera launches a free VPN app for iOS2025-09-19 01:07
Did you hear the one about Jennifer Lawrence punching Sophie Turner in the vagina?2025-09-19 00:51
Samsung Galaxy Note7 teardown reveals the magic behind the phone's iris scanner2025-09-19 00:06
Full Unreal Engine compatibility coming to Google's Daydream VR2025-09-18 23:51