时间:2025-04-03 17:30:13 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Man stumbles upon his phone background in real life2025-04-03 17:06
AmazonFresh will now deliver your groceries directly to your car2025-04-03 16:21
Dating app figures out what we all hate about sex2025-04-03 15:56
John Stamos' pants gave him a lot of trouble at a recent show2025-04-03 15:53
Is Samsung's Galaxy Note7 really the best phone?2025-04-03 15:41
The best Chandler Bing one2025-04-03 15:38
New 'Dunkirk' footage is a heart2025-04-03 15:37
New app will finally let you be your best emoji self2025-04-03 15:16
We asked linguists if Donald Trump speaks like that on purpose2025-04-03 14:56
Concept design puts stunning U2025-04-03 14:44
Uber's $100M settlement over drivers as contractors may not be enough2025-04-03 17:28
Owner gives adorable 32025-04-03 17:12
New 'Dunkirk' footage is a heart2025-04-03 16:47
'Invader Zim' is back to conquer earth in a new TV movie revival2025-04-03 16:41
Katy Perry talks 'Rise,' her next batch of songs, and how to survive Twitter2025-04-03 16:40
J.K. Rowling uses SpongeBob to sum up her feelings about Brexit2025-04-03 16:38
Lawmaker wants discrimination protection for climate deniers2025-04-03 16:13
The best Chandler Bing one2025-04-03 15:50
This coloring book is here for all your relationship goals2025-04-03 14:49
SelfScore makes credit cards for the international students Trump wants to keep out2025-04-03 14:47