时间:2026-04-19 06:58:48 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
There's a big piece of fake chicken stuck to this phone case2026-04-19 06:19
The 13 crappiest robots, ranked2026-04-19 06:16
Apple knows AirTags can be abused and is trying to get ahead of it2026-04-19 06:08
Apple Music gets lossless and spatial audio in June2026-04-19 05:56
Hiddleswift finally followed each other on Instagram after 3 excruciating days2026-04-19 05:30
Twitter may introduce special labels for humor and satire accounts2026-04-19 05:26
Researcher claims to hack AirTag so it points to wrong website when scanned2026-04-19 04:59
Netflix's 'Bad Trip' is a perfect film: Movie review2026-04-19 04:58
You will love/hate Cards Against Humanity's new fortune cookies2026-04-19 04:35
'Godzilla vs. Kong' posts pandemic2026-04-19 04:29
Is Samsung's Galaxy Note7 really the best phone?2026-04-19 06:57
How to help with COVID2026-04-19 06:34
Tinder releases 'Are You Sure?' feature to stop harmful messages before they happen2026-04-19 06:09
Apple releases new Apple Watch bands and faces for Pride month2026-04-19 05:32
Balloon fanatic Tim Kaine is also, of course, very good at harmonica2026-04-19 05:18
Crypto startup Dfinity takes on Ethereum with launch of Internet Computer2026-04-19 04:45
Why the spectacular Muldrow Glacier is surging in Alaska2026-04-19 04:43
Netflix's 'Bad Trip' is a perfect film: Movie review2026-04-19 04:33
Make money or go to Stanford? Katie Ledecky is left with an unfair choice.2026-04-19 04:20
A Q&A with the host of 'Exit Scam,' a podcast about QuadrigaCX2026-04-19 04:14