时间:2026-10-16 08:01:20 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Australian football makes history with first LGBT Pride Game2026-10-16 07:48
Man fiercely proud of his daughter's refusal to pay a $15 parking ticket2026-10-16 07:34
Hurricane Maria is the one to worry about, out of 3 Atlantic storms2026-10-16 07:15
Lorde sticks it to school bullies with ultimate revenge: a 'Vogue' cover2026-10-16 07:12
U.S. pole vaulter skids to a halt for national anthem2026-10-16 07:02
BBC presenter accidentally drops the c2026-10-16 06:53
The future of obnoxiously loud autoplay videos is in doubt2026-10-16 06:23
You can now put Instagram filters on your videos2026-10-16 06:12
Cat gets stuck in the most awkward position ever2026-10-16 06:02
GoPro’s Fusion 3602026-10-16 05:49
Here's George Takei chilling in zero gravity for the 'Star Trek' anniversary2026-10-16 07:05
Evan Spiegel explains why Snapchat is making virtual art installations2026-10-16 06:47
Donald Trump's latest retweet proves once again he's an immature child2026-10-16 06:22
'The Good Place': Why you should watch2026-10-16 06:16
Xiaomi accused of copying again, this time by Jawbone2026-10-16 06:09
Chili's can apparently answer your healthcare questions better than any politician2026-10-16 06:08
Attention, human monsters: You can now purchase a Border Patrol Agent costume for Halloween2026-10-16 05:41
Dude crashes his parachute in a packed stadium of football fans2026-10-16 05:29
Dramatic photo captures nun texting friends after Italy earthquake2026-10-16 05:28
Hurricane Maria is the one to worry about, out of 3 Atlantic storms2026-10-16 05:21