时间:2025-11-20 03:42:38 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
This 'sh*tpost' bot makes terrible memes so you don't have to2025-11-20 03:35
Mark Zuckerberg has found a new sense of style. Why?2025-11-20 02:46
A 'Bluey' kids party in Las Vegas upset children and parents2025-11-20 02:29
四萬分不成問題 !除了詹姆斯外,現役有哪些球星可能衝擊三萬分 ?(詹姆斯的三分命中率)2025-11-20 02:18
Early Apple2025-11-20 02:11
皮皮蝦需不需要去黑線2025-11-20 02:05
梅西帶領阿根廷奪冠 球迷為什麽要C羅美貌的老婆 表一個態(梅西 小碎步)2025-11-20 01:55
賽季第四次“戴帽” ,哈蘭德繼續衝擊英超進球紀錄2025-11-20 01:47
Plane makes emergency landing after engine rips apart during flight2025-11-20 01:16
When will OpenAI's GPT2025-11-20 00:59
Olympics official on Rio's green diving pool: 'Chemistry is not an exact science'2025-11-20 03:42
Discover Samsung Summer Sale: Day One2025-11-20 03:09
今日賽事:英超(狼隊vs曼聯)2025-11-20 02:51
體壇早七點(2023.1.11)2025-11-20 02:31
'Rocket League' Championship Series Season 2 offers $250,000 prize pool2025-11-20 01:49
NYT's The Mini crossword answers for May 32025-11-20 01:45
哈登傷退火箭雙加時滅湖人(哈登得過幾次助攻王)2025-11-20 01:29
阿膠固元糕和阿膠糕區別2025-11-20 01:28
Carlos Beltran made a very interesting hair choice2025-11-20 01:04
NYT's The Mini crossword answers for May 72025-11-20 01:01