时间:2025-03-01 00:54:29 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
This coloring book is here for all your relationship goals2025-03-01 00:34
豬頭肉涼拌怎麽做好吃2025-03-01 00:24
孕婦散步肚子發硬起來2025-03-01 00:17
中草藥什麽時候喝最好2025-02-28 23:09
Dressage horse dancing to 'Smooth' by Santana wins gold for chillest horse2025-02-28 22:54
【波盈足球】 阿根廷世足賽奪冠 球評:法國兩度扳平不容易 ( 法國,阿根廷 )2025-02-28 22:48
怎樣判斷牙髓是否壞死2025-02-28 22:19
李子和梨子能一起吃嗎2025-02-28 22:15
This coloring book is here for all your relationship goals2025-02-28 22:15
Apple to finally let you customize Home Screen icons on iPhone, report says2025-02-28 22:12
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-03-01 00:44
血糖高可以吃玉米粥嗎2025-02-28 23:33
肚子裏有炎症怎麽回事2025-02-28 23:29
做了深蹲之後大腿酸痛2025-02-28 23:15
Teacher absolutely nails it with new homework policy2025-02-28 23:13
水果酵素的配方是什麽2025-02-28 23:10
益生菌要吃多久才有效2025-02-28 22:51
那種梨子水止咳效果好2025-02-28 22:49
Metallica to seek and destroy your eardrums with new album this fall2025-02-28 22:43
世界杯八強決出2席 !荷蘭32025-02-28 22:19