时间:2025-04-03 01:19:34 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
You want to cut the cord. You hate your cable company. You hate their calls, their promotional offer
You want to cut the cord. You hate your cable company. You hate their calls, their promotional offers, their bills, their service reps. And the option to get away from them, in the form of the future: Streaming. A little digital river for you to dip into, and find yourself, outside of the traditional means of getting you're favorite TV and movies. You're on your own. You're in the wild. The future is yours, and it's cordless. Except for one, single problem: The fact remains that in 2016, cable remains a far better, more stable experience than any streaming service out there.
SEE ALSO:AT&T launches long-awaited online TV streaming serviceWith Monday's announcement of AT&T's new DirecTV streaming service, there are now even more chances to cut the damn cord alreadyand embrace a streaming-only future. DirecTV's new service joins SlingTV and Playstation VUE on the market, with more (like one from Hulu) still to come.
Despite the growing number of options, I'm still clinging to my old school, cable box ways. Noneof the options are perfect, but cable is the devil I know, the consistent option I've lived with all my life. You'll have to pry my remote from my cold, dead hands.
My excitement for SlingTV was deflated almost immediately upon logging on and fighting through a clunky, confusing interface. There's an awful lot of left and right scrolling, just to find the channel I want, with no way to directly input channel numbers. (To its credit, Playstation Vue offers a channel grid that resembles standard cable guide menus.)
Then there's the question of viewing quality. Your quality from the cable box depends, of course, on the signal output from your cable carrier; there's no guarantee you're going to get a signal strong enough to exploit the crispness of that fancy 4k television. But at least you'll get a signal.
With the streaming services, your quality is only as good as your internet. Want to stream Monday Night Footballor The Bachelorwhile working? Depending on your internet speed, you may need to pick and choose.
Cable signals aren't perfect, and have their fair share of outages, but there's so much more potential for things to go awry when modems and wifi signals are involved. Nothing kills the experience of a Westworldor Game of Thronesreveal quite like the Buffering Circle of Frustration.
Tweet may have been deleted
The biggest argument in favor of the streaming options over cable is the cost. After all, subscribing to cable comes with some hefty fees and price increases after an initial introductory period, issues absent from the streaming services.
The exception is AT&T's "Go Big" tier, which will increase from $35 a month to $60 after an undetermined length of time, though a spokesperson from AT&T confirmed to Mashable that early adopters will be grandfathered in to the lower price as long as they keep service.
But there are downsides to streaming service pricing plans—namely, the continued existence of priced tiers, and additional add-ons to get everything you want. Granted, your mileage and cost-per-package may vary based on what yourpreferences are.
For example, SlingTV offers their base tier at $20. Not bad. But there are exclusions, such as the Fox networks. To get those, you'll need the next tier up, which is $25 and doesn't carry the ESPN channels. So if you want both the ESPN andFox channels, you'll need to get the top—and most expensive—tier, currently listed at $40.
Then there are the missing channels. Have Playstation Vue but want Comedy Central? Then you'll need to pony up for an additional Hulu subscription.
It's not too difficult to creep north of $60-$70 a month with some of the middle tiers, especially when adding premium channels like HBO and Cinemax or adding extra services, like SlingTV's sports and comedy packages to get channels like NFL RedZone or MTV.
When you add that to the necessary cost of internet fast enough to support your streams, it's no cheaper than many bundles cable companies offer. Your cost will vary (depending on your location, and thus, cable provider options), but I found plenty of affordable packages, including one at $50 a month featuring over 130 channels and high-speed internet up to 100 Mbps, and another at 280 channels with 150 Mbps internet at $110.
While those prices often increase after the first year, there are ways to keep prices down, from switching tiers to the old "threaten to leave the service" song-and-dance. It's not as convenient as switching between tiers of streaming options, but it's not impossible.
Aside from sports, it's rare I get a chance to watch anything when it originally airs, making DVR something I rely on, rather than an added amenity.
SlingTV announced it's finally adding this functionality in 2017 but it won't be available on all channels (no word yet on which channels will be included). AT&T's service will launch with DVR but that functionality will reportedly be added in 207. Playstation Vue is a bit better, in that it offers DVR functionality with only a few limitations.
Tweet may have been deleted
While a certain number of episodes are available on-demand from many shows on these streaming options, there are still limitations to those services that reliable DVR renders moot.
And speaking of "on-demand," some of the channels offered on streaming services are "on-demand only," meaning you get a smattering of options but no "live" feed. In other words: No Simpsonsmarathon on FXX for you, SlingTV users.
Tweet may have been deleted
Same with the other major networks. While some of the streaming services are starting to roll out access to your local NBC or CBS station, those are limited, based on market and many are simply "on demand." If you want to watch the local NFL broadcast or keep track of your favorite local weatherman, you'll need to add a digital antenna to your arsenal.
The streaming era just started. SlingTV was the first major service to come along, and there's a certain curse in going first; you'll be nitpicked, maybe to the end. Subsequent services are learning from those mistakes, and trying to make the experience far better—less technically wonky, with better pricing, and sharper user experience. Streaming can be the future.
And eventually, we'll get there. But we're not there yet, and there's plenty of time to figure it out. And maybe there's a service that already fits you! That's great!
But, for now, it's hard for me to take the plunge when cable's reliability remains intact.
J.K. Rowling makes 'Harry Potter' joke about Olympics event2025-04-03 00:46
詹姆斯和鮑爾同時拿到兩雙,帶領湖人隊狂勝黃蜂隊!(23號湖人詹姆斯)2025-04-03 00:15
五連勝穩居西部第一 :錫安末節12分完勝大帝 CJ42+11三分讓哈登汗顏(12版哈登進階幾次成功)2025-04-03 00:12
卡塔爾世界杯的球星開什麽車 ?C羅開布加迪,梅西選奧迪Q7(c羅為什麽比不過梅西)2025-04-02 23:39
This 'sh*tpost' bot makes terrible memes so you don't have to2025-04-02 23:35
今夜的武球王星光熠熠!造點+助攻堪比c羅跟梅西 ,西班牙人瘋狂(c羅)2025-04-02 23:28
詹姆斯44+10+9總得分超張伯倫 湖人力克開拓者4連勝(詹姆斯7洛杉磯)2025-04-02 23:19
大帝42+11率76人擒鵜鶘 哈登27+8錫安26+6+7傷退(11年哈登)2025-04-02 23:00
Watch MTV's Video Music Awards 2016 livestream2025-04-02 22:50
哈登炮轟籃網 ,濃眉傷退湖人大勝,歐文三分絕殺(11號哈登)2025-04-02 22:48
Fiji wins first2025-04-03 01:12
字母哥42+10雄鹿擒鵜鶘 東契奇遭逐獨行俠負 76人險勝猛龍(哈登季後賽最高助攻)2025-04-03 00:45
Mark Zuckerberg wants to be like Augustus Caesar. How close is he?2025-04-03 00:43
卡塔爾世界杯的球星開什麽車?C羅開布加迪,梅西選奧迪Q7(c羅為什麽比不過梅西)2025-04-03 00:43
Slack goes down again, prompting anxiety everywhere2025-04-03 00:42
35歲的梅西 ,37歲的C羅,3項數據對比,球迷:C羅時代結束了(c羅和梅西哪個更厲害沒有爭議)2025-04-03 00:03
恩比德狂轟42分 ,76人複仇鵜鶘!哈登27分8助 ,錫安又受傷了(哈登44+17)2025-04-02 23:54
恩比德42+11哈登27分 錫安傷退76人擒鵜鶘取主場十連勝(哈登數據統計)2025-04-02 23:50
Tourist survives for month in frozen New Zealand wilderness after partner dies2025-04-02 22:47
當我們為梅西和C羅爭吵時 ,都在吵些什麽?(c羅和梅西誰更受歡迎)2025-04-02 22:34