时间:2025-09-18 13:39:23 来源:网络整理编辑:探索
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from i
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from its users.。
In a statement on the company's blog, Evernote said it would no longer be implementing the privacy policy it had previously announced and that its machine learning updates, which necessitated some employees read portions of user notes, would be solely opt-in. 。
SEE ALSO:Evernote won't let you opt out of employees reading parts of your notes。The update comes one day after Evernote CEO Chris O'Neill said the company "communicated poorly" about the proposed changes but didn't back away from the changes, which he said would improve the company's note taking software.。
"We will be revising our existing Privacy Policy to address our customers’ concerns, reinforce that their data remains private by default, and confirm the trust they have placed in Evernote is well founded," the company said in an update posted by Evernote's senior director of communications, Greg Chiemingo.。
"In addition, we will make machine learning technologies available to our users, but no employees will be reading note content as part of this process unless users opt in."。
Thanks for signing up! 。
In an effort to improve its machine learning technology, Evernote had said that some employees would be able to view portions of users' notes for quality control. O'Neill later clarified that personally identifying information would be hidden, but the explanation did little to reassure the privacy conscious.。
While the latest update will no doubt come as welcome news, it raises the question of whether it is too little too late. As others have pointed out, Evernote can still gain access to users' notes in certain circumstances, like complying with a warrant from a law enforcement agency. 。
And while a promise to "revisit" its policies is a step in the right direction, without thoroughly explaining the alternatives, it's difficult to assess whether this is a short term fix to a publicity problem or the beginner of a longer term commitment to protecting user privacy.。
By making its original changes opt-out only, so that users would automatically be enrolled into the new features unless they changed their account settings, the company sent a message -- intended or not -- that its technology was more important than its users privacy. That's not something that can be easily undone with an apologetic blog post.。
New Zealand designer's photo series celebrates the elegance of aging2025-09-18 13:36
Star Wars is political, and it always has been2025-09-18 13:27
Capcom deems its own 'Street Fighter V' stage too distracting for pros2025-09-18 12:53
Rare 'thunderstorm asthma' event take five lives in Australian city2025-09-18 12:44
Whyd voice2025-09-18 12:20
Windows 'Solitaire' game comes to Android and iOS for the first time2025-09-18 12:04
Donald Trump cancels, then uncancels, meeting with the 'not nice' New York Times2025-09-18 11:56
Being sexist can be bad for a man's psychological health, too2025-09-18 11:23
Darth Vader is back. Why do we still care?2025-09-18 11:16
Bumbling Trump adviser Kris Kobach's secret plan for America, revealed2025-09-18 11:15
Despite IOC ban, Rio crowds get their political messages across2025-09-18 12:47
Star Wars is political, and it always has been2025-09-18 12:40
Grocery shoppers get a taste of life below the poverty line in new ad campaign2025-09-18 12:25
Tsunami warning issued for Fukushima, Japan after powerful earthquake2025-09-18 12:08
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town2025-09-18 12:04
Grandma finally gets Christmas celebration she's always wanted2025-09-18 11:36
Donald Trump cancels, then uncancels, meeting with the 'not nice' New York Times2025-09-18 11:17
Rare 'thunderstorm asthma' event take five lives in Australian city2025-09-18 11:11
'The Flying Bum' aircraft crashes during second test flight2025-09-18 11:11
Donald Trump cancels, then uncancels, meeting with the 'not nice' New York Times2025-09-18 10:58