时间:2026-01-09 08:21:03 来源:网络整理编辑:娛樂
Twitter has again changed how it describes blue tick badges, effectively stripping its whole verific
Twitter has again changed how it describes blue tick badges, effectively stripping its whole verification system of the last shred of meaning it still had.
Late last month, Twitter announced it would begin to remove free blue verification badges from legacy verified accounts on Apr. 1. These badges had been applied to the accounts of people who were notable in their field of work and thus likely targets for impersonation, such as actors, reporters, and politicians. If these users still want to keep their blue tick badge, Twitter said they'll need to pay $8 per month for its subscription service Twitter Blue going forward.
However, April Fools' Day has since come and gone, and the expected blue tick rapture never arrived. Instead, Twitter simply quietly updated its description of blue ticks so that they're all identical regardless of if they were paid for or not.
SEE ALSO:Twitter's biggest users say they won't be paying for Twitter Blue checkmarksPreviously, clicking or tapping on a blue tick badge in a user's profile would cause a window to pop up offering one of two explanations. If the badge belonged to a legacy verified account, the text would read, "This account is verified because it’s notable in government, news, entertainment, or another designated category." In contrast, if the user paid Twitter for their little blue badge, the window would instead read, "This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue."
Now after Twitter's recent update, the same message appears regardless of whether the blue tick was earned or bought: "This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account."
Tweet may have been deleted
This change may be due to Twitter's legacy verification system. According to a report by The Washington Post, removing the blue tick badges is "a largely manual process" that involves verification data saved in a spreadsheet. This means that there may be no way to bulk remove verification badges from legacy accounts as Twitter had implied it would do.
With Twitter having laid off thousands of employees over the past few months, it's also possible there aren't enough people left to manually remove legacy badges in any sort of timely fashion.
Thus, rather than actually remove legacy verified blue ticks, Twitter has simply made them indistinguishable from paid badges. And in doing so, it has also made impersonators completely indistinguishable from real accounts.
This has not been a popular decision among Twitter's users. Some have pointed out that not only does this change make Twitter's blue ticks mean even less than they already did, but it also has the potential to do immense harm by giving scammers the guise of credibility.
Mashable reached out to Twitter for comment and received its poop emoji auto-response.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
One legacy-verified Twitter account that did lose its blue tick was theNew York Times, which stated it has no plans to pay for the check mark. However, this specific removal appears to have occurred after a user made Twitter CEO Elon Musk aware of the publication's stance through a meme, rather than through Twitter removing legacy badges more generally. This also prompted Musk to post tweets disparaging the Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times' reporting.
The New York Timesisn't the only legacy-verified user to publicly state that they'd rather let their blue tick disappear than subscribe to Twitter Blue. Numerous others, including actors Ian McKellen and Karl Urban, basketball player LeBron James, and wrestler Big Damo have also indicated they won't pay, warning followers to be on the lookout for scammers and impersonators going forward.
Tweet may have been deleted
Ironically, if Twitter's policy continues as it is, a blue tick may eventually become a mark against an account's legitimacy.
TopicsTwitter
You will love/hate Cards Against Humanity's new fortune cookies2026-01-09 08:02
Hurricane Florence is coming to the East Coast. Here's what to expect.2026-01-09 07:41
Apple responds to President Trump's proposed tariffs2026-01-09 07:32
10 years later, a look back at 'Step Brothers'2026-01-09 07:13
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2026-01-09 07:10
3D printed guns: an explainer2026-01-09 06:49
Mayonnaise ice cream exists and the internet has lost all hope2026-01-09 06:47
Google's Android One program is an evolution of the Nexus initiative2026-01-09 06:33
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2026-01-09 05:53
6 problems with the foster care system2026-01-09 05:47
Watch MTV's Video Music Awards 2016 livestream2026-01-09 07:59
Surprise! 'Fortnite' is blowing every game out of the water on Twitch2026-01-09 07:38
New leaked photos show Apple's low2026-01-09 07:30
Google Assistant is still a lot smarter than Siri, new study shows2026-01-09 07:24
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2026-01-09 07:00
Apple's iPhone XS will be historic, but not for the reason you think2026-01-09 06:48
Lisa Brennan2026-01-09 06:14
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's hearing on conservative shadowbanning was a mess2026-01-09 06:12
This app is giving streaming TV news a second try2026-01-09 06:11
'First Man' review: Damien Chazelle's moon landing movie soars2026-01-09 05:38