您的当前位置:首页 >時尚 >【】as a source only in limited situations. 正文
时间:2025-04-02 12:13:09 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending。The 。 Daily Mail 。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail 。
.。
Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。Thanks for signing up! 。
Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication." 。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the 。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page. 。 The ruling does not mean the。Mail 。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source. 。 The 。 Mail 。joins the。 National Enquirer 。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun 。
You can now play 'Solitaire' and 'Tic2025-04-02 11:56
Google warns of 'hermit spyware' infecting Android and iOS devices2025-04-02 11:50
A meteorite punched a hole in a dog house. Now it's a collector's item.2025-04-02 11:34
Twitter to Elon Musk after he pulled out of buyout deal: 'We'll see you in court'2025-04-02 11:13
Despite IOC ban, Rio crowds get their political messages across2025-04-02 11:11
PS5 restock at Walmart and Amazon: How to buy the console on June 22025-04-02 10:36
'Stranger Things' fans: Call the Surfer Boy Pizza number for a fun surprise2025-04-02 10:34
Qualcomm's new Snapdragon chip brings more power to Android phones2025-04-02 10:28
'Rocket League' Championship Series Season 2 offers $250,000 prize pool2025-04-02 09:37
Stunning fat bear wakes up from hibernation and is still huge2025-04-02 09:34
This chart shows just how high Simone Biles can jump2025-04-02 12:05
Twitter pays $150 million fine over privacy and Elon Musk has thoughts2025-04-02 12:04
This simple air fryer French fry recipe will give you the perfect homemade side dish2025-04-02 11:56
NASA's Mars Perseverance rover films dust devil mayhem2025-04-02 11:32
Darth Vader is back. Why do we still care?2025-04-02 11:06
Most streamed TV shows of the week prove the Force is strong with 'Obi2025-04-02 10:58
TikTok trend reminds people to be kinder to themselves2025-04-02 10:53
How can men help dismantle misogyny and violence? This book will tell you how.2025-04-02 10:43
5 people Tim Cook calls for advice on running the biggest company in the world2025-04-02 10:16
Twitter to Elon Musk after he pulled out of buyout deal: 'We'll see you in court'2025-04-02 10:15