您的当前位置:首页 >時尚 >【】as a source only in limited situations. 正文
时间:2025-07-19 09:08:22 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail 。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending。The。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail。
. 。
Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews. 。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。Thanks for signing up!。
Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people." 。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock 。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication." 。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the 。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the。Mail。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.。 The。 Mail。joins the。 National Enquirer 。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun。
Dressage horse dancing to 'Smooth' by Santana wins gold for chillest horse2025-07-19 09:03
Lyft deal: Spend $100, save $15 on a Lyft gift card2025-07-19 09:02
Buy a Google Pixel 8a, get a $100 Amazon gift card2025-07-19 09:00
Microsoft unveils Copilot Agents, an AI business assistant2025-07-19 08:21
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2025-07-19 07:36
Microsoft unveils Copilot Agents, an AI business assistant2025-07-19 07:26
Microsoft Build 2024: What to expect2025-07-19 07:21
Lyft deal: Spend $100, save $15 on a Lyft gift card2025-07-19 07:08
Slack goes down again, prompting anxiety everywhere2025-07-19 06:40
NYT's The Mini crossword answers for May 162025-07-19 06:40
Australian football makes history with first LGBT Pride Game2025-07-19 08:58
Google Password Manager now lets you share your passwords with family2025-07-19 08:52
Microsoft unveils Copilot Agents, an AI business assistant2025-07-19 08:31
Wordle today: The answer and hints for May 172025-07-19 08:22
Airbnb activates disaster response site for Louisiana flooding2025-07-19 07:58
NYT's The Mini crossword answers for May 112025-07-19 07:44
Buy a Google Pixel 8a, get a $100 Amazon gift card2025-07-19 07:29
iOS 18: A mysterious new audio feature is reportedly coming to Apple Music2025-07-19 07:06
'Rocket League' Championship Series Season 2 offers $250,000 prize pool2025-07-19 07:00
Wordle today: The answer and hints for May 182025-07-19 06:47