您的当前位置:首页 >時尚 >【】as a source only in limited situations. 正文
时间:2025-04-26 13:30:20 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending。The。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail 。
. 。
Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。Thanks for signing up!。
Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people." 。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the 。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the。Mail 。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source. 。 The 。 Mail 。joins the 。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun。
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2025-04-26 13:12
Brave midwife rides an inflatable swan through a flood to deliver a baby2025-04-26 13:06
Formula One head says women 'wouldn’t be taken seriously' in the sport2025-04-26 12:24
This UK gambling site offers interesting odds for 'Game of Thrones' Season 62025-04-26 12:23
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2025-04-26 12:17
Synchronized swim team hires male stripper for high school banquet2025-04-26 12:07
Now you can read 'Don Quixote' in 17,000 tweets2025-04-26 11:55
Detachable penis added to statue to foil thieves2025-04-26 11:39
Is Samsung's Galaxy Note7 really the best phone?2025-04-26 11:26
Conor McGregor announces he will 'retire young,' but is he for real?2025-04-26 11:13
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-04-26 13:21
One of many: Chyna's just the latest pro wrestling star to die way too young2025-04-26 13:07
Fire tears through refugee camp in northern Greece, destroying a dozen tents2025-04-26 12:51
Why it's impossible for John Kasich to talk about college rape and alcohol2025-04-26 12:44
Watch MTV's Video Music Awards 2016 livestream2025-04-26 12:40
UK to give 1 million workers terror attack training2025-04-26 12:13
Public overwhelmingly votes to call $200 million research vessel Boaty McBoatface2025-04-26 11:50
Calvin Klein has no interest in Kendall Jenner's Calvin Klein ads2025-04-26 11:36
Olympian celebrates by ordering an intimidating amount of McDonald's2025-04-26 11:21
You cannot stop Russell Westbrook from dancing2025-04-26 10:44