您的当前位置:首页 >時尚 >【】as a source only in limited situations. 正文
时间:2025-04-03 10:54:22 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the。Daily Mail 。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending 。The。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail 。
.。
Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up!。
Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the 。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail 。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the。Mail 。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.。 The。 Mail 。joins the。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular. 。
The Sun 。
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2025-04-03 10:49
'White Nonsense Roundup' is here to take on racist Facebook posts2025-04-03 10:36
Politician explains what a Tupac Shakur is to parliament2025-04-03 09:58
Donald Trump will get the keys to the surveillance state2025-04-03 09:45
Aly Raisman catches Simone Biles napping on a plane like a champion2025-04-03 09:39
Kid Cudi publicly thanks collaborators and industry peers in touching letter2025-04-03 09:37
Your money after Trump: Stick to your plan2025-04-03 08:58
Boy who wrote touching letter to child war victim melts our hearts again2025-04-03 08:53
Olympian celebrates by ordering an intimidating amount of McDonald's2025-04-03 08:36
How the Trump transition is being run like a Miss Universe pageant2025-04-03 08:21
Metallica to seek and destroy your eardrums with new album this fall2025-04-03 10:49
Watch out Kylie Jenner, North West is coming for your makeup throne2025-04-03 09:53
Klay Thompson to the Celtics? How fake news infiltrates sports, too.2025-04-03 09:48
'The Grand Tour' will stream worldwide as Amazon Prime Video expands2025-04-03 09:31
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-04-03 09:29
Pink announces pregnancy with Instagram photo2025-04-03 09:19
No, Apple isn't spying on your iPhone call history2025-04-03 09:04
White House, meet white nationalist: Steve Bannon gets top Trump job2025-04-03 08:48
Two astronauts just installed a new parking spot on the International Space Station2025-04-03 08:30
NFL player's reaction to frightening head injury is heartbreaking2025-04-03 08:15