时间:2025-04-26 23:08:09 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
The key to online success is usually dependent on one major factor above all others: Your website's
The key to online success is usually dependent on one major factor above all others: Your website's ranking on Google Search.
For decades now, an entire industry – Search Engine Optimization or "SEO" – has revolved around attempting to crack the code that moves a given page up the ranks for various keyword search queries on Google.
This week, that "code," or more specifically the secrets behind Google's search engine algorithm, have leaked.
"In the last quarter century, no leak of this magnitude or detail has ever been reported from Google’s search division," said Sparktoro CEO Rand Fishkin, a longtime influential figure in the SEO industry.
Tweet may have been deleted
Fishkin has worked in the industry for years and founded the well-established SEO company, Moz. Fishkin's long SEO history is likely why an unnamed person chose to send him Google’s internal "Content API Warehouse" document. This 2,500 page document details a slew of previously unknown or unconfirmed knowledge about how Google decides to rank websites on its search engine.
Once receiving the leak, Fishkin and a number of other SEO and digital marketing leaders went to work to verify the document. After examining the pages, they believed the leak to be legitimate. Google would not confirmthe legitimacy of the leak outright at first, however, Fishkin shared that a Google employee contacted him in order to change the characterization of some of the details he posted in his breakdown of the document.
Late Wednesday, Google provided confirmation that the document was indeed legitimate in an email to The Verge.
SEE ALSO:We gave Google's AI Overviews the benefit of the doubt. Here's how they did.There is a lot of technical information in the document, which appears to be more for developers and technical SEO professionals than for the layperson or even SEO professionals who specialize in content creation. However, there are some extremely interesting details that everyone can walk away with from this leak.
This is particularly of interest as Google has previously deniedusing Chrome to rank websites.
According to the documents parsed by experts like Fishkin, it appears that Google tracks how many clicks a webpage receives from users in its web browser, Chrome, in order to choose which pages of a website to include in its search query sitemap.
So, while it doesn't seem that Google uses this info to decide where to rank an entire site outright, analysts have surmised that the company does use Chrome activity in order to decide which internal pages to show in search under the website's homepage.
SEO expert Mike Kingof iPullRank flagged this one, and it's brought about more questions than answers.
According to analysis of Google's internal document, the company has a specific flag it attaches to "small personal websites." It's unclear how Google determines what a "small" or "personal" website is, nor is there any information as to why Google is marking websites with this tag. Is this to help promote them in search? To demote them in the rankings?
Its purpose is a mystery at this time.
This is another issue that SEO experts have long speculated about, which Google has deniedover the years. And, once again, it looks like the experts were right.
It turns out that Google relies on user clicks for search rankings much more than was previously known.
NavBoost is a Google ranking factor that focuses on enhancing search results. It focuses heavily on click data to improve these results. According to King, we now know that NavBoost has a "specific module entirely focused on click signals." One major factor that determines a website's ranking for a search query: short clicks versus long clicks or how long a user stays on a page after clicking on the link from a Google search.
If you've ever come across a domain name with multiple keywords and dashes, like used-cars-for-sale.net for example, at least part of the reason was likely SEO. There has been a long held belief among domain investors and the digital marketing community that Google rewarded exact match domain names.
It turns out that this isn't always true. In fact, an exact match domain can hurt your rankings.
Around a decade ago, Google did sharethat exact match domain names would no longer be held in high regard as a tool for earning rankings, despite being favored by the algorithm at one time. However, we now have evidence thanks to this leak that there is a mechanism to actively demote these websites in Google Search. It turns out that Google views many of these types of domains in the same light as keyword stuffing practices. The algorithm views this type of url as potential spam.
According to analysis of the documents, Google has whitelists for certain topics. This means that websites that appear in Google Search for these types of search queries need to be manually approved and don't appear based on the normal algorithmically ranked search factors.
Some of the topics aren't too surprising. Websites containing content related to COVID information and politics queries, specifically around election information, are whitelisted.
However, there is a whitelist for travel websites as well. It's unclear exactly what this whitelist is for. SEO experts have suggested that this could be related to travel sites appearing in specific Google travel tabs and widgets.
Fishkin, King, and other SEO experts have been able to confirm and debunk quite a few SEO theories thanks to this leaked document. And it's now clear to them that Google hasn't been entirely truthful regarding how its search algorithm worked over the years.
“'Lied' is harsh, but it’s the only accurate word to use here," King wrote in his own breakdown of the Google Content API Warehouse document.
"While I don’t necessarily fault Google’s public representatives for protecting their proprietary information, I do take issue with their efforts to actively discredit people in the marketing, tech, and journalism worlds who have presented reproducible discoveries," he said.
As industry experts continue to pore through this massive document, we may soon find out some more interesting details hidden in Google's search algorithm.
A Google representative declined Mashable's request for comment.
UPDATE: May. 30, 2024, 10:52 a.m. EDT Google has since confirmed the legitimacy of the leaked document. This piece has been updated to reflect this information.
TopicsGoogleAdvertising
Over 82,000 evacuate as Blue Cut fire rapidly spreads in southern California2025-04-26 22:27
中超八冠王廣州隊直播帶貨:年輕球員為觀眾抽獎 點讚23萬2025-04-26 22:23
悲喜交加!巴薩基本無緣哈蘭德 但烏姆蒂蒂終於要走了2025-04-26 22:15
四大皆空!曼聯連續5年無獎杯入賬 本賽季爭4極危2025-04-26 22:03
Plane makes emergency landing after engine rips apart during flight2025-04-26 21:57
老帥再出山!前中國女足主帥裴恩才執教廣西平果唄儂女足2025-04-26 21:51
卡薩諾 :C羅不是足壇最佳 不該僅用進球數評判球員2025-04-26 21:16
曼聯爆發內訌!英媒 :B費不滿被換下 怒懟朗尼克2025-04-26 21:14
You can now play 'Solitaire' and 'Tic2025-04-26 21:09
國足12強賽名單:武磊無緣 巴西4歸化集體缺席2025-04-26 20:47
Olympic security asks female Iranian fan to drop protest sign2025-04-26 23:02
西蒙尼險被曼聯球迷水瓶砸中 賽後沒和朗尼克握手2025-04-26 23:00
亞足聯官方 :中國澳大利亞參加U17和U20女足世界杯2025-04-26 22:31
馮瀟霆遭網暴:趕緊退役吧!還可以去吐槽大會2025-04-26 22:30
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2025-04-26 22:16
國足最新陣容立足防守:完成新老交替 避免連敗崩盤2025-04-26 21:59
馬德興 :中國足球各種爭論不在一個平麵上 也難有共識2025-04-26 21:39
阿森納利物浦身價 :總和14億歐 薩拉赫力壓薩卡2025-04-26 21:07
Dramatic photo captures nun texting friends after Italy earthquake2025-04-26 21:00
KO皇馬!曼城哈蘭德已達協議 3000萬年薪超C羅丁丁2025-04-26 20:37