时间:2025-04-26 17:45:57 来源:网络整理编辑:娛樂
This column is part of a series called "Voices of Women in Tech," created in collaboration with Anit
This column is part of a series called "Voices of Women in Tech," created in collaboration with AnitaB.org, a global enterprise that supports women in technical fields, as well as the organizations that employ them and the academic institutions training the next generation.
When it comes to women in technology, there's a lot of data out there. Whether it's the fact that women still hold less than a quarter of technical roles, or the studies that show — time and again — that diversity can help improve a company's bottom line, it’s easy to see how data can help illuminate some of our industry’s darkest problems and drive change.
But even with the best analysis, gender bias is often unconscious and unintentional. Recently, I spoke with a prominent woman in tech who leads an engineering team about one example. She shared that some companies, when made aware of the biases of some words disproportionately used to describe female leadership — such as “abrasive” and “aggressive” — have responded by banning managers from using those words when reviewing women’s performance. But then, predictably, other words sneak in to replace the forbidden phrases; consider the rise of the word “intense.” It begins to feel like a game of Whac-a-Mole, trying to unravel these biases through training.
SEE ALSO:How 'returnships' help women in tech get back to work after a parenting breakOf course, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t continue to try. But we also need to explore what else we can do to jumpstart the change in culture that we, as women leaders in technology, would love to see.
Personally, I think it starts with data — and not just data about how women are treated, or paid, or promoted. We also need access to data so that everyone in the company gets an equal opportunity to understand how their business is doing.
"Those in positions of power often maintain their status by holding closely onto information that others can’t access."
Early in my career, when I was a product marketing manager at Google, I remember being told that we made all decisions based on data. Sounds good, right? But the reality at that time was that only some people could get their hands on the data they needed to make those decisions. Certainly, no product manager or engineer wanted to spend time helping a young product marketer measure her campaign performance or understand the impact of updating her product webpage. Just like most companies, Google was divided into two camps: “data-haves” and “data-have-nots.” This disparity inevitably leads to quieting voices and reducing diversity, because leaders only value the voices of those who have all the information.
At many companies, it’s often the CEO and leadership team who have a team of hardworking analysts delivering important data about the business. Meanwhile, the rest of the employees have to wait in a long queue of requests to get data access or analysis in order to make informed decisions. This dynamic of scarcity supports the traditional opportunity cycle within an organization: Those in positions of power often maintain their status by holding closely onto information that others can’t access. And, traditionally, those in power come from the old guard of leadership — not the most diverse set of people.
Of course, many entrepreneurial spirits are frustrated by finding themselves on the “have-not” side of the table and will scrounge for data to start doing their own analysis. And although I love this “get-stuff-done” ethos — these are the people I always want to hire — initiative and determination won’t truly fix this problem, especially if everyone relies on different sets of data, or different metrics. And that obscurity around data leads to highest paid person’s opinion (HiPPO) ruling the decision-making process. It’s also part of the reason why the loudest people often succeed in getting their opinions pushed through: Without data to bring people together, discourse favors those that are able to get their voices heard. And, once again, people with the megaphone tend to be the same types of people who have always held power.
But the solution is simple: Everyone — every employee — needs access to a unified view of a company’s business data. By giving everyone an equal view, companies can begin to increase the diversity of ideas and opportunities. Every contributor can help diagnose the organization’s challenges and share their ideas for solving them. Women and members of underrepresented groups, who are rarely afforded the opportunity to be the loudest voices or the HiPPO, are better able to get ideas across backed by data-validated, agreed-upon facts.
The debate can then return to using that consensus to drive decision-making, and to bring the focus back to where it needs to be: Making the business more successful.
TopicsSocial Good
Teacher absolutely nails it with new homework policy2025-04-26 17:32
國安VS深圳首發:安德森PK卡爾德克 金特羅替補2025-04-26 17:27
津門虎隊員關注中甲最後一輪大戰 提前為附加賽做心理預案2025-04-26 17:11
2021年收官戰再染紅 拉莫斯心中的憋屈有誰能懂 ?2025-04-26 17:00
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-04-26 15:56
聯賽杯半決賽對陣:阿森納VS利物浦 熱刺VS切爾西2025-04-26 15:46
廣州隊VS海港首發:韋世豪蔣光太先發 奧斯卡出戰2025-04-26 15:40
博斯克 :哈維在糟糕的時間接手巴薩 但他是紅藍之子2025-04-26 15:34
Aly Raisman catches Simone Biles napping on a plane like a champion2025-04-26 15:20
國安平深圳止頹勢 “新隊長”張玉寧成最大亮點2025-04-26 15:16
Major earthquake and multiple aftershocks rock central Italy2025-04-26 17:33
保級分析 :津門虎下輪戰重慶或定生死 青島隊最危險2025-04-26 17:07
意媒 :國米總部並未被搜查 稅警隻是造訪收集材料2025-04-26 16:36
萊科:山東創造完美賽季 我們隻關心自身表現2025-04-26 16:25
Early Apple2025-04-26 16:25
山區女孩因足球改變命運 “追風計劃”故事獲全球華人短視頻大賽社會責任獎2025-04-26 16:11
津門虎隊員關注中甲最後一輪大戰 提前為附加賽做心理預案2025-04-26 16:10
中超最新身價 :海港獨霸榜首 廣州隊倒數第五2025-04-26 15:39
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-04-26 15:25
拜仁計劃將劉邵子洋外租 對其評價很高+有明確規劃2025-04-26 15:09