时间:2025-04-04 05:17:09 来源:网络整理编辑:娛樂
This column is part of a series called "Voices of Women in Tech," created in collaboration with Anit
This column is part of a series called "Voices of Women in Tech," created in collaboration with AnitaB.org, a global enterprise that supports women in technical fields, as well as the organizations that employ them and the academic institutions training the next generation.
When it comes to women in technology, there's a lot of data out there. Whether it's the fact that women still hold less than a quarter of technical roles, or the studies that show — time and again — that diversity can help improve a company's bottom line, it’s easy to see how data can help illuminate some of our industry’s darkest problems and drive change.
But even with the best analysis, gender bias is often unconscious and unintentional. Recently, I spoke with a prominent woman in tech who leads an engineering team about one example. She shared that some companies, when made aware of the biases of some words disproportionately used to describe female leadership — such as “abrasive” and “aggressive” — have responded by banning managers from using those words when reviewing women’s performance. But then, predictably, other words sneak in to replace the forbidden phrases; consider the rise of the word “intense.” It begins to feel like a game of Whac-a-Mole, trying to unravel these biases through training.
SEE ALSO:How 'returnships' help women in tech get back to work after a parenting breakOf course, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t continue to try. But we also need to explore what else we can do to jumpstart the change in culture that we, as women leaders in technology, would love to see.
Personally, I think it starts with data — and not just data about how women are treated, or paid, or promoted. We also need access to data so that everyone in the company gets an equal opportunity to understand how their business is doing.
"Those in positions of power often maintain their status by holding closely onto information that others can’t access."
Early in my career, when I was a product marketing manager at Google, I remember being told that we made all decisions based on data. Sounds good, right? But the reality at that time was that only some people could get their hands on the data they needed to make those decisions. Certainly, no product manager or engineer wanted to spend time helping a young product marketer measure her campaign performance or understand the impact of updating her product webpage. Just like most companies, Google was divided into two camps: “data-haves” and “data-have-nots.” This disparity inevitably leads to quieting voices and reducing diversity, because leaders only value the voices of those who have all the information.
At many companies, it’s often the CEO and leadership team who have a team of hardworking analysts delivering important data about the business. Meanwhile, the rest of the employees have to wait in a long queue of requests to get data access or analysis in order to make informed decisions. This dynamic of scarcity supports the traditional opportunity cycle within an organization: Those in positions of power often maintain their status by holding closely onto information that others can’t access. And, traditionally, those in power come from the old guard of leadership — not the most diverse set of people.
Of course, many entrepreneurial spirits are frustrated by finding themselves on the “have-not” side of the table and will scrounge for data to start doing their own analysis. And although I love this “get-stuff-done” ethos — these are the people I always want to hire — initiative and determination won’t truly fix this problem, especially if everyone relies on different sets of data, or different metrics. And that obscurity around data leads to highest paid person’s opinion (HiPPO) ruling the decision-making process. It’s also part of the reason why the loudest people often succeed in getting their opinions pushed through: Without data to bring people together, discourse favors those that are able to get their voices heard. And, once again, people with the megaphone tend to be the same types of people who have always held power.
But the solution is simple: Everyone — every employee — needs access to a unified view of a company’s business data. By giving everyone an equal view, companies can begin to increase the diversity of ideas and opportunities. Every contributor can help diagnose the organization’s challenges and share their ideas for solving them. Women and members of underrepresented groups, who are rarely afforded the opportunity to be the loudest voices or the HiPPO, are better able to get ideas across backed by data-validated, agreed-upon facts.
The debate can then return to using that consensus to drive decision-making, and to bring the focus back to where it needs to be: Making the business more successful.
TopicsSocial Good
Samsung Galaxy Note7 teardown reveals the magic behind the phone's iris scanner2025-04-04 05:08
川崎主帥 :雖然廣州隊的表現不如預期 但本場比賽並不輕鬆2025-04-04 04:28
U23國足主帥 :對亞運會有信心 超齡球員已入隊適應2025-04-04 04:04
超齡球員跟隨U23國足首訓 揚科:他們代表著中國足球的形象2025-04-04 04:01
Two astronauts just installed a new parking spot on the International Space Station2025-04-04 03:50
山東主帥:與對手實力差距巨大 滿意隊員的場上表現2025-04-04 03:38
朗尼克談曼聯引援:打造強隊不難 但瞎搞永遠不行2025-04-04 03:34
多特將貝林厄姆視為球隊新核心 利物浦皇馬欲挖角2025-04-04 03:29
The five guys who climbed Australia's highest mountain, in swimwear2025-04-04 03:26
屈辱的一天 !韓國三支亞冠球隊全部輸給東南亞球隊2025-04-04 02:57
Ivanka Trump's unpaid interns share cringeworthy financial advice2025-04-04 05:01
曝梅州場地初檢未達標或不承辦中超 聯賽可能無限延期2025-04-04 05:00
曝張玉寧吳曦張琳芃3名超齡球員或將增援U23國足2025-04-04 04:46
真升降機 !富勒姆時隔一賽季重返英超 近5年3升2降2025-04-04 04:29
Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news2025-04-04 04:09
曝張玉寧吳曦張琳芃3名超齡球員或將增援U23國足2025-04-04 03:58
U23國足主帥 :對亞運會有信心 超齡球員已入隊適應2025-04-04 02:56
蔚山主帥參加賽前發布會:還沒有決定對陣廣州隊的首發2025-04-04 02:50
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2025-04-04 02:47
角色反了 ?內馬爾竟被假摔騙黃牌 遭貢多齊一通演2025-04-04 02:46