时间:2025-07-03 12:51:08 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
We’ve been debating Net Neutrality for more than 20 years. In that time, the internet's gone t
We’ve been debating Net Neutrality for more than 20 years. In that time, the internet's gone through substantial changes, and maybe those old concerns about an open and equal internet might no longer be a concern?
Not even close.
If anything, the concerns of 1996 are of greater importance and urgency today, as media-conglomerates like Comcast and Verizon take control of both the pipelines for internet access and content with alarming regularity. Then there's the last champion of Net Neutrality, the Federal Communications Commission, with their new chairman: Ajit Pa, who's made it crystal clear that he's got no love for the FCC Net Neutrality Rules enacted in 2015.
SEE ALSO:Under Trump, dark days ahead for net neutrality and the open internetWhether or not it's true, it’s time to face facts: Net Neutrality's as good as dead.
Not to be doomsayers, but it's time to buckle up: There's a load of impacts, many of them not good, that can happen the moment ISP’s can choose which content they want on their networks, what speeds they want to serve it at, and how much they want to charge you for content they own versus content other people own.
Here's a look at what life is like when Net Neutrality's no longer the law of the land:
Broadband's filling up with companies that own both the pipes and the content that flows through them. Think back to the early days of cinema, when movie studios owned the theaters their movies played. It was an unhealthy alliance that shut out smaller studios who didn’t own theaters from distributing other films, and competing with, for instance, Paramount Studios on a level playing field. The U.S. government stepped in in 1948 and broke up this monopoly.
But a new monopoly's being created now. When ISPs and wireless service providers also own broadcast networks (Comcast and NBC/Universal) or even Google Fiber and YouTube, it can lead to them favoring access to their content over other independent shows and movies.
This is why people are freaking out about "zero rating." If you don’t have to eat up mobile data to stream this week’s episode of NBC-Comcast's This Is Usbecause you’re also a Comcast customer, you may wonder why you don’t get the same benefit streaming the CBS sitcom Kevin Can Wait. CBS is put at an unfair disadvantage here, because you're now incentivized to watch only NBC shows, thereby starving the competition of viewers and, potentially, ad dollars.
With that in mind, think of a company like Netflix, which, by some measures, accounts for more than a third of the internet’s bandwidth usage, could find that fewer people are tuning into the next season of Stranger Things because it’s costlier. And so on.
So what's Netflix do when they start losing subscribers, because their content is more expensive to watch? They charge their shrinking subscriber base more money, of course.
Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video might also find that service producers want to start charging them more for their excessive bandwidth needs. That cost will be passed along to consumers, as well. In the meantime, the ISPs and wireless providers that have content partners may give all of them a free pass, creating a massive content highway imbalance.
Those smaller content platforms like Crackle? Hope you enjoyed them while they lasted. They're gonna be hard-pressed to pay ISP carrier fees, and their choices will be to sell out to conglomerates, or fold up altogether.
Amazon's the world’s most popular online shopping site. The New York Timesis the preeminent news source. Netflix is your go-to-binge site. And so on. One day, long after Net Neutrality's dead and buried, you go online through your phone or desktop, and every time you type in “Amazon,” the web browser opens the Home Shopping Network (HSN). As a Charter Communications customer, you’re confused, until you realize that Liberty Media owns a minority stake in Charter, and owns 100% of the Home Shopping Network. HSN isn't Amazon, but surely, it’ll work for you.
Extreme? Maybe, but there will soon be nothing stopping ISPs from building Amazon, NYT and Netflix knockoffs whose service they legally can prioritize over the other websites.
If a media conglomerate decided to stream a major sports event to all its customers, it may prioritize that bandwidth over other streaming content. Don’t like the Super Bowl? Fine, enjoy some 2G-speed Netflix, or some stuttering multi-player video-gaming. Have fun with that.
No one in this world's truly neutral. So why wouldn’t we expect ISPs to have a point of view? Without the FCC and Net Neutrality rules to stop them, ISPs could offer better access to some websites over others—maybe right-leaning or left-leaning sites over one another. Maybe it pulls all the content it doeswant you to see onto an accessible proxy server, while leaving everything else lost in the open internet wilderness.
Proponents of ending Net Neutrality will tout de-regulation and greater competition, which could—theoretically—lead to greater innovation and lower prices for online access. That may be somewhat true for mobile broadband providers, where there's decent competition, and plenty of programs tailored to foster our mobile binge-watching habits, regardless of who provides that content. But fixed broadband offers regional consumers few (if any) competitive choices.
In addition, ISPs and carriers clearly aren’t satisfied with serving bits and bytes to consumers. They want access to the more lucrative and dynamic creative side, as well. In the space of two years, Verizon's acquired AOL and Yahoo. Both companies deliver content that could compete with websites, media companies and cable networks that remain unaffiliated with broadband companies.
And broadband and wireless service providers will continue buying content companies, while media orphans increasingly struggle to find open, agnostic ways to access audience. They'll be stuck in neutral.
And this will be our new net reality. Get ready for what's to come.
TopicsNet Neutrality
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2025-07-03 12:38
巴西爆冷止步八強,內馬爾掩麵痛哭,梅西率領阿根廷再創紀錄(梅西進過幾次決賽)2025-07-03 12:33
阿根廷與荷蘭會師1/4決賽!千場梅西創造多項記錄!韓國世界杯16強獎金人均54w,球迷 :國足看不上!(梅西又創一項紀錄)2025-07-03 12:02
【波盈足球】 英超利物浦簽下荷蘭世足進球王 前鋒陣容超驚人 ( 利物浦,荷蘭 )2025-07-03 11:46
Teacher absolutely nails it with new homework policy2025-07-03 11:19
新賽季法甲首秀 !梅西1戰衝5大紀錄 800球裏程碑在望(梅西個人進球數)2025-07-03 10:49
富而喜悅神預測走紅世界杯!2022卡塔爾世界杯得冠預測全記錄曝光!(世界杯2022賽程時間表決賽)2025-07-03 10:32
克羅地亞VS阿根廷:連續兩屆殺入4強,回顧格子軍團25年的高低起伏(克羅地亞和阿根廷誰厲害些)2025-07-03 10:26
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town2025-07-03 10:17
小白觀看世界杯必讀,兩分鍾入門足球賽場規則及術語(足球守門員規則有哪些要求)2025-07-03 10:13
More than half of women in advertising have faced sexual harassment, report says2025-07-03 12:40
卡塔爾世界杯 ,也是各國文化秀(卡塔爾世界杯歌曲中文)2025-07-03 12:31
最初的夢想 最後的機會(梅西賽前亮相)2025-07-03 12:26
世界杯4強全部出爐 !半決賽對陣敲定 ,實力懸殊,沒有強強對話(克羅地亞淘汰阿根廷了嗎)2025-07-03 11:21
Researchers create temporary tattoos you can use to control your devices2025-07-03 11:17
東方神曲《早安隆回》燃爆卡塔爾世界杯(卡塔爾世界杯歌曲女主唱)2025-07-03 11:06
世界杯克羅地亞vs加拿大誰厲害(克羅地亞和阿根廷誰厲害一些)2025-07-03 11:06
梅西傳射破多項紀錄 阿根廷隊率先闖入世界杯決賽!(阿根廷世界杯決賽梅西射門)2025-07-03 10:49
Give your kitchen sponge a rest on this adorable bed2025-07-03 10:29
守門員二次觸球規則(足球守門員可以全場跑嗎)2025-07-03 10:08