时间:2025-07-04 09:00:27 来源:网络整理编辑:娛樂
Worried about a dystopian future in which AI rule the world and humans are enslaved to autonomous te
Worried about a dystopian future in which AI rule the world and humans are enslaved to autonomous technology? You're not alone. So are billionaires (kind of).
First it was the Partnership on AI formed by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and IBM.
Then came Elon Musk and Peter Thiel's recent investment in $1 billion research body, OpenAI.
Now, a new batch of tech founders are throwing money at ethical artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems (AS). And experts say it couldn't come sooner.
LinkedIn founder, Reid Hoffman, and eBay founder, Pierre Omidyar (through his philanthropic investment fund) donated a combined $20 million to the Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Fund on Jan. 11 -- helping ensure the future's more "man and machine, not man versus machine," as IBM CEO Ginny Rometty put it to WSJ Thursday.
But how will they put their praxis where their prose is, and what's at stake if they don’t?
"There's an urgency to ensure that AI benefits society and minimises harm," said Hoffman in a statement distributed via fellow fund contributors, The Knight Foundation. "AI decision-making can influence many aspects of our world -- education, transportation, healthcare, criminal justice and the economy -- yet data and code behind those decisions can be largely invisible."
That's a sentiment echoed by Raja Chatila, executive committee chair for the IEEE Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems. The IEEE Standards Association aims educate and empower technologists in the prioritisation of ethical considerations that, in their opinion, will make or break our relationship with AI and AS.
The organisation's Ethically Aligned Design study, published in Dec., is step one in what they hope will be the beginning of a smarter working relationship between humans and systems.
"You either prioritise well-being or you don't -- it's a binary choice," said Chatila.
Like Hoffman, Chatila feels a palpable sense of urgency when it comes to work of these research bodies. For him, our sense of democracy could be sacrificed if we begin fearing algorithms or data usage that we don't fully understand, could distort our voice.
"The United Nations has chosen to prioritise the analysis and adoption of autonomous weapons in 2017. This is because beyond typical military issues, these discussions will very likely set precedents for every vertical in AI," he told Mashable.
"Beyond the issue of weapons, what's also really at stake is human agency as we know it today. When individuals have no control over how their data is used, especially in the virtual and augmented reality environment to come, we risk having outlets to express our subjective truth." The algorithmic nightmare that was Facebook's "fake news" comes to mind.
Meanwhile the Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Fund says it will aim to support a "cross-section of AI ethics and governance projects and activities," globally and other members mentioned to date include Raptor Group founder Jim Pallotta and William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, who've committed another $1 million each.
Activities the fund will support, according to the statement, include a joint AI fellowship for people helping keep human interests at the forefront of their work, cross-institutional convening, research funding and promoting topics like ethical design, accountability, innovation and communicating about AI and AS more broadly.
While stewardship of ethical research in AI seems more urgent than ever, there's no concrete cause for concern when it comes to innovation in the field. According to Chatila, current or future unintended ethical consequences aren't the result of AI designers or companies being "evil" or uncaring.
"It's just that you can't build something that's going to directly interact with humans and their emotions, that makes choices surrounding intimate aspects of their lives, and not qualify the actions a machine or system will take beforehand," he said.
"For instance, if you build a phone with no privacy settings that captures people's data, some users won't care if they don't mind sharing their data in a typical fashion.
"But for someone who doesn't want to share their data in this way, they'll buy a phone that honours their choices with settings that do so. This is why a lot of people are saying consumers will 'pay for privacy.'" Which of course, becomes less of an issue if manufacturers are "building for values" from the get-go.
"We need to move beyond fear regarding AI, at least in terms of Terminator-like scenarios. This is where applied ethics, or due diligence around asking tough questions regarding the implementation of specific technologies, will best help end users,” he said.
IEEE is currently working on a Standard along the lines of a "best practice" document called "P7000" that Chatila says will help update the systems development process to include explicitly Ethical factors.
“Having organisations and companies become signatories [to industry standards] would be fantastic, where they reorient their innovation practices to include ethical alignment in this way from the start," he said.
With OpenAI, the IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design project and now the Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Fund, there could be every chance companies will move beyond good intentions and into standardised practices that factor human well-being into design.
So long as they hurry the heck up. Innovation waits for nought.
"You either prioritise well-being or you don't -- it's a binary choice," said Chatila. "And if you prioritise exponential growth, for instance, that means you can't focus on a holistic picture that best reflects all of society's needs."
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceLinkedIn
Samsung Galaxy Note7 teardown reveals the magic behind the phone's iris scanner2025-07-04 08:58
郜林腸胃炎需手術已退出足協杯 深足轉場大連迎戰申花2025-07-04 08:50
爭議!德國裁判成功搶戲 西蒙尼拒絕與克洛普握手2025-07-04 08:01
郝偉愛子上演正式比賽首秀 泰山隊史首次父子兵齊上陣2025-07-04 07:35
Satisfy your Olympics withdrawals with Nike's latest app2025-07-04 07:33
19日賠率:馬競利物浦握手言和 米蘭終止歐冠連敗2025-07-04 07:16
複仇!利物浦歐冠首勝馬競 32年來首度21場正賽不敗2025-07-04 07:15
丁丁裏程碑之戰送寫意助攻 布魯日球迷起立鼓掌致意2025-07-04 07:13
How Hyperloop One went off the rails2025-07-04 07:05
韓喬生:武磊的邊緣化已不可避免 下粒進球遙遙無期2025-07-04 06:54
One of the most controversial power struggles in media comes to a close2025-07-04 08:58
本澤馬視頻敲詐案本周三開庭 若定罪將被監禁5年2025-07-04 08:33
滬媒:申花這場勝利背後克服了太多困難 複仇戰解氣2025-07-04 08:30
撒狗糧!比賽場邊拜仁男球迷用親吻安慰藥廠女球迷2025-07-04 08:19
Did our grandparents have the best beauty advice?2025-07-04 07:56
周末大瓜 !伊卡爾迪出軌旺達好友 分手一天和好?2025-07-04 07:46
全華班泰山麵對中乙隊輕鬆過關 衝擊冠軍機會絕佳2025-07-04 07:25
曼聯球員認為索帥還有兩場自救機會 贏不了就下課2025-07-04 07:15
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2025-07-04 07:05
拜仁有意德國新晉國腳接替科曼 已和經紀人有接觸2025-07-04 06:45