时间：2025-12-28 00:41:46 来源：网络整理编辑：百科
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
WhatsApp announces plans to share user data with Facebook2025-12-28 00:30
A NASA probe saw a double eclipse of the sun from space2025-12-28 00:16
How you can use a bullet journal to live a healthier life2025-12-28 00:06
Is this Alphabet's burrito2025-12-27 23:46
Darth Vader is back. Why do we still care?2025-12-27 23:35
Singapore got 10 religious leaders to bless upcoming F1 race2025-12-27 23:15
The love story of Gene Wilder and Gilda Radner, through the years2025-12-27 23:07
This 1 piece of crucial English speaking advice is sending the internet wild2025-12-27 22:52
Make money or go to Stanford? Katie Ledecky is left with an unfair choice.2025-12-27 22:08
Elon Musk unveils new safety upgrades to Tesla's Autopilot system2025-12-27 21:55
U.S. pole vaulter skids to a halt for national anthem2025-12-28 00:41
Magical pothole in Scotland bears remarkable resemblance to Australia2025-12-27 23:10
Watch: 'Brave' six2025-12-27 22:53
Leslie Jones is back on Twitter and her comeback tweet rules2025-12-27 22:40
Florida hurricane forecast remains uncertain, but trends in state's favor2025-12-27 22:35
Singapore got 10 religious leaders to bless upcoming F1 race2025-12-27 22:28
Asus may have created the ultimate Surface Pro 4 clone2025-12-27 22:16
River turns red in Russia just like in your worst Biblical nightmare2025-12-27 22:07
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2025-12-27 22:00
'Stranger Things' Season 2: 10 Burning Questions2025-12-27 21:58
