时间:2025-02-28 20:49:07 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Tributes flow after death of former Singapore president S.R. Nathan2025-02-28 20:33
Apple's new Fitness+ feature might make Peloton sweat2025-02-28 20:18
NFL paints 'End Racism' on its fields and no, this isn't a joke2025-02-28 19:16
Apple's new Fitness+ feature might make Peloton sweat2025-02-28 19:15
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2025-02-28 19:00
Elon Musk: Tesla Battery Day tech won't be mass produced until 20222025-02-28 18:51
Facebook launches climate change information center2025-02-28 18:42
The livestreaming boom isn't slowing down anytime soon2025-02-28 18:33
Sound the alarms: Simone Biles finally met Zac Efron2025-02-28 18:14
Pinterest adds to ban on promotion of culturally insensitive costumes2025-02-28 18:05
Darth Vader is back. Why do we still care?2025-02-28 20:27
The Galaxy S20 Fan Edition features flagship specs for a more affordable price2025-02-28 20:16
'Marvel's Avengers' is a superhero saga that's only just beginning2025-02-28 20:15
Review: The Whoop fitness tracker is great for people who love data2025-02-28 20:10
This weird squid looks like it has googly eyes, guys2025-02-28 19:33
M. Night Shyamalan reveals his next movie in a poster and set photo2025-02-28 19:29
Colossal Western fires look ever more menacing, viewed from space2025-02-28 19:25
'Marvel's Avengers' is a superhero saga that's only just beginning2025-02-28 19:16
Olympian celebrates by ordering an intimidating amount of McDonald's2025-02-28 19:02
A Dog's Take: Alexa Guard Plus will NEVER replace dogs2025-02-28 18:15