时间：2025-07-07 07:38:51 来源：网络整理编辑：百科
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Teacher absolutely nails it with new homework policy2025-07-07 07:29
Jury trial to decide whether the 'Star Trek' fan film boldly went too far2025-07-07 07:19
Janet Jackson gives birth to her first child at age 502025-07-07 07:01
World map proves basically every country has a terrible tourism slogan2025-07-07 06:31
Slack goes down again, prompting anxiety everywhere2025-07-07 06:27
A&E announces docu2025-07-07 06:21
This is (probably) your last chance to get an NES Classic before the holidays2025-07-07 05:52
Cinnabon fails the galaxy with terrible tweet about Carrie Fisher's death2025-07-07 05:29
Xiaomi accused of copying again, this time by Jawbone2025-07-07 04:59
Veteran soldier becomes the face of demonetization woes in India2025-07-07 04:58
Felix the cat just raised £5000 for charity because she's the hero we all need2025-07-07 07:25
We put too much trust in algorithms and it's hurting our most vulnerable2025-07-07 07:07
Torrential rain turns Australia's desert heart into a series of waterfalls2025-07-07 06:54
How the murder of a Russian official went massively viral on Facebook2025-07-07 06:16
Mom discovers security cameras hacked, kids' bedroom livestreamed2025-07-07 05:44
Ellen DeGeneres cancels appearance of singer who made homophobic remarks2025-07-07 05:43
What you should expect from the iPhone in 20172025-07-07 05:17
Double parker receives shoppers' wrath in the form of shopping carts2025-07-07 05:13
Balloon fanatic Tim Kaine is also, of course, very good at harmonica2025-07-07 04:58
Taco Bell teases a hungry nation with spicy lava chicken chips2025-07-07 04:56
