时间:2025-04-26 21:14:43 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
WhatsApp announces plans to share user data with Facebook2025-04-26 21:13
Judge rules bar had right to kick out man in MAGA hat. Relax.2025-04-26 21:00
Writers hop on Twitter to air out their weirdest celebrity interview2025-04-26 20:56
Just a bunch of books we really love and think you should love too2025-04-26 20:53
Tyler, the Creator helped Frank Ocean celebrate 'Blonde' release in a delicious way2025-04-26 20:50
Jenna Fischer finally reveals what Pam said to Michael during their airport goodbye2025-04-26 20:04
The best part of Mark Zuckerberg appearing in front of Congress was the memes2025-04-26 19:24
5 burning questions about Amy Schumer's truly baffling 'I Feel Pretty'2025-04-26 19:19
Olympics official on Rio's green diving pool: 'Chemistry is not an exact science'2025-04-26 18:53
New space animation shows dust zipping around a comet2025-04-26 18:41
Florida hurricane forecast remains uncertain, but trends in state's favor2025-04-26 21:05
Robot mascot allows 142025-04-26 20:44
How mutual masturbation can help close the orgasm gap2025-04-26 20:38
'Star Trek' marks a milestone with the series first female director2025-04-26 20:14
Mall builds real2025-04-26 19:54
9 news and politics podcasts that'll help you make sense of the world2025-04-26 19:48
Listen to the moment Southwest 1380 tells air traffic control someone was sucked out of the plane2025-04-26 19:38
Think of our pain: the "big story coming" tweet needs to end2025-04-26 19:34
Nate Parker is finally thinking about the woman who accused him of rape2025-04-26 19:01
Queen Elizabeth II's last royal corgi passes away2025-04-26 18:44