时间:2025-10-28 20:59:37 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
One of the most controversial power struggles in media comes to a close2025-10-28 20:48
Insane footage shows hot air balloon crashing into power lines before landing in lake2025-10-28 20:41
New MacOS 10.14 features appear to leak ahead of WWDC 20182025-10-28 20:39
Chris Evans trolls Chris Pratt on his birthday, gets the ultimate response2025-10-28 20:28
What brands need to know about virtual reality2025-10-28 20:20
Broccoli coffee is a thing, because you're not eating your vegetables2025-10-28 20:10
Elon Musk weighs in on the migrant family separation debate2025-10-28 20:03
‘Jurassic World’: What was the headbutting dinosaur who saved the day?2025-10-28 18:54
Satisfy your Olympics withdrawals with Nike's latest app2025-10-28 18:51
Instagram on desktop is way better for being a creep2025-10-28 18:29
This coloring book is here for all your relationship goals2025-10-28 20:30
Chris Evans trolls Chris Pratt on his birthday, gets the ultimate response2025-10-28 20:11
Shut the f*ck up, Marco Rubio2025-10-28 20:00
Bitcoin and ether rally on SEC announcement2025-10-28 19:57
Pokémon Go is so big that it has its own VR porn parody now2025-10-28 19:41
Steve Trevor is coming back for 'Wonder Woman 2'2025-10-28 19:38
Lena Waithe pays tribute to fellow trailblazers in heartfelt speech at MTV Awards2025-10-28 19:34
PSA: You can get a free taco at Taco Bell on Wednesday2025-10-28 18:58
5 people Tim Cook calls for advice on running the biggest company in the world2025-10-28 18:22
Thanos reads Trump's tweets on 'The Late Show' with Stephen Colbert2025-10-28 18:15