您的当前位置:首页 >探索 >【】Tweet may have been deleted 正文
时间:2025-02-28 23:37:13 来源:网络整理编辑:探索
Unless you're involuntarily locked in the cellar of some Berkeley farm cooperative, being a Trump su
Unless you're involuntarily locked in the cellar of some Berkeley farm cooperative, being a Trump supporter does not make you an oppressed minority in America. At least according to one judge. 。
Tell that to Philadelphia accountant Greg Piatek, who sued The Happiest Hour bar in New York City after the bar allegedly kicked him out for wearing the infamous red Make America Great Again hat.。
Piatek claimed that MAGA was his religion, and that he was a victim of religious discrimination when the bar kicked him out for expressing his spiritual beliefs. 。
On Wednesday, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice David Cohen ruled that the bar's ejection was legal, as MAGA is technically not a religion.。
“Anyone who supports Trump — or believes in what you believe — is not welcome here," Piatek claims the bartender at The Happiest Hour told him. "And you need to leave right now because we won’t serve you'”
Piatek alleges that the bartender ejected him only after he and his friends complained about poor service. 。
State discrimination laws do not protect Americans from political discrimination. Discrimination laws do, however, protect customers from religious discrimination.。
Thanks for signing up! 。
Tweet may have been deleted。
“He was paying spiritual tribute to the victims of 9/11. The Make American Great Again hat was part of his spiritual belief," Piatek's lawyer, Paul Liggieri, told Judge Cohen. 。
“How many members are in this spiritual program that your client is engaged in?
“How many members are in this spiritual program that your client is engaged in?” Judge David Cohen asked. 。
“Your honor, we don’t allege the amount of individuals,” Liggieri said. 。
“So, it’s a creed of one?”
“Yes, your honor,” Liggieri said.。
Piatek's suit for emotional damages was denied when the judge ruled that the bar's behavior didn't represent "outrageous conduct" and that the “plaintiff does not state any faith-based principle to which the hat relates.”
Apparently Judge David Cohen doesn't have any respect for my uncle's Religion, "Temple of the Bucket Hat." Shame on him.。
Fiji wins first2025-02-28 23:34
Samsung's next plan to prevent Note7 explosions is a software update2025-02-28 23:16
The iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are water2025-02-28 22:27
Study details the sugar industry's attempt to shape science2025-02-28 22:22
Over 82,000 evacuate as Blue Cut fire rapidly spreads in southern California2025-02-28 21:49
Google's plan for modular smartphones have reportedly been abandoned2025-02-28 21:46
Elon Musk unveils new safety upgrades to Tesla's Autopilot system2025-02-28 21:41
Apple announces Australian prices for the iPhone 7 and it ain't cheap2025-02-28 21:31
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-02-28 21:30
Queen Elizabeth is hiring a live2025-02-28 20:57
Mall builds real2025-02-28 23:08
Samsung's next plan to prevent Note7 explosions is a software update2025-02-28 22:46
Sea level rise is worsening Hermine's coastal flooding2025-02-28 22:37
Is this Alphabet's burrito2025-02-28 22:30
Two astronauts just installed a new parking spot on the International Space Station2025-02-28 22:23
Here's 10 of the most brutal jokes about Ann Coulter from 'The Roast of Rob Lowe'2025-02-28 22:13
Mosaic sushi will satisfy your obsession with neatness and food2025-02-28 21:07
Girl instantly regrets putting on that charcoal face peel2025-02-28 21:05
This company is hiring someone just to drink all day2025-02-28 20:59
The new Strike in 'Destiny: Rise of Iron' has an unkillable boss2025-02-28 20:51