时间:2026-01-01 01:03:32 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Australia's Great Barrier Reef is under serious threat as warming waters kill off large swaths of co
Australia's Great Barrier Reef is under serious threat as warming waters kill off large swaths of corals. But it's not "in danger" -- at least not according to UNESCO.
The United Nations cultural body this week voted to leave the 133,000-square-mile World Heritage Site off its list of endangered sites, which is the last stage before a site is delisted altogether. Perplexingly, the same body last month warned the Great Barrier Reef will be dead by the end of this century unless countries sharply reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
So, why the disconnect?
SEE ALSO:This adorable baby turtle blob is bringing hope to Southeast AsiaBecause the decision has less to do with the reef's imperiled condition and more to do with avoiding political embarrassment for Australia's government and lasting damage to Australia's tourism industry.
Nemo, found.Credit: evergreen/unescoThe coral reef system represents around A$56 billion -- or $42.4 billion in U.S. dollars -- in economic, social, and brand value to the Australian economy, Deloitte Access Economics said in a recent report. The reef's status as a World Heritage Site is part of what makes it so iconic, recognizable, and inspiring to tourists around the world.
Australian officials breathed a sigh of relief after the World Heritage Committee voted on late Wednesday in Krakow, Poland.
"The announcement overnight was a big win for Australia and a big win for the [Malcolm] Turnbull government," Australia's Energy Minister Josh Frydenberg told Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Credit: UNESCOHe said the vote was "a strong endorsement" of the government's Reef 2050 plan to improve water quality, reduce land clearing, and increase the reef's resilience to climate change by mid-century.
But coral reef experts and environmental groups said they were frustrated by the outcome.
Putting the Great Barrier Reef on the endangered list would create pressure on the Australian government to reduce planet-warming emissions and to take more aggressive steps to combat marine pollution, starfish invasions, and other local threats, critics said.
"An endangerment listing, as tragic as that would be, would be a more realistic representation of the state of reef and would at least force the federal government to act on climate change," Alix Foster Vander Elst, Greenpeace Australia Pacific campaigner, told Reuters.
Damaged corals of Australia's Great Barrier Reef.Credit: ED ROBERTS/ARC CENTRE CORAL REEF STUDIES HANDOUT/EPA/REX/ShutterstockEven with its 2050 plan, Australia's management of the expansive natural wonder is facing increasing criticism as sweeping sections of the reef turn bleach-white.
In 2015 and 2016, the Great Barrier Reef suffered its largest die-off ever recorded due to unusually warm waters, with 35 percent of corals on the northern and central reef declared dead, the ARC Center of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies said in late May.
Scientists blamed human-caused global warming and a strong 2015 to 2016 El Niño for the hotter water temperatures, which can cause coral bleaching. In this phenomenon, corals expel their symbiotic algae and become more vulnerable to disease and death.
Sea surface temperature departures from average in March 2016.Credit: Mitchell BlackAt the meeting in Poland, the World Heritage Committee did express "serious concern" about the health of the reef, which includes over 600 coral types and provides shelter and sustenance for thousands of marine species -- everything from algae, worms, and snails to fish, turtles, and sharks.
But the decision not to list the reef as "in danger" suggests the committee believes the Australian government is doing enough to keep the precious reef from disappearing.
Given how rapidly oceans are warming, however, those efforts will likely fall far short, experts say.
TopicsUnited Nations
Sound the alarms: Simone Biles finally met Zac Efron2026-01-01 00:53
Meat Loaf, legendary 'Bat Out of Hell' singer and actor, dies at 742026-01-01 00:32
What the giant James Webb telescope will see that Hubble can't2026-01-01 00:31
Facebook has a new name: Meta2025-12-31 23:56
You can now play 'Solitaire' and 'Tic2025-12-31 23:54
What we bought in January 2022: Dog clothes, people clothes, and more2025-12-31 23:29
How to connect Fitbit to your phone2025-12-31 23:23
Disney+ is now compatible with Apple's SharePlay2025-12-31 22:52
Did our grandparents have the best beauty advice?2025-12-31 22:29
Netflix adds short clips feature for kids, because everything is TikTok now2025-12-31 22:24
Teacher absolutely nails it with new homework policy2026-01-01 00:45
NASA and ESA tech geeks posted an 'unboxing' of the Hubble telescope's successor2026-01-01 00:37
NASA didn't invent Velcro. But it did dream up these surprising things.2026-01-01 00:35
GoDaddy hosting service discloses customer hack2026-01-01 00:21
Olympic security asks female Iranian fan to drop protest sign2026-01-01 00:20
Instagram will now show suspected hate speech lower in your Feed2026-01-01 00:04
Sculpture made of 100 Magic Wand vibrators looks like it's out of 'Game of Thrones'2025-12-31 23:43
Sculpture made of 100 Magic Wand vibrators looks like it's out of 'Game of Thrones'2025-12-31 22:59
Snapchat is about to explode in popularity, report says2025-12-31 22:47
At long last, 'copypasta' and 'air fryer' have been added to the dictionary2025-12-31 22:21