您的当前位置:首页 >百科 >【】UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT 正文
时间:2025-09-19 14:44:51 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT。 A ruling in a different case on Wednesday, Sept. 7 may have ch
UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT 。
A ruling in a different case on Wednesday, Sept. 7 may have changed the course of Uber's fight over its use of contractors.。
An appeals court ruled that drivers suing over background check practices must fight their cases separately, rather than in a class-action suit. That's because the court upheld an arbitration agreement in the drivers' contracts.。
The ruling could be used to disband the class-action case in O'Connor v. Uber.。
Without the power of a large class-action suit, Uber drivers will be unlikely to win any changes to their status as contractors.。
A $100 million settlement Uber was ordered to pay to drivers in a class-action lawsuit may not be enough, a judge said Thursday.。
Uber had agreed to pay $100 million to drivers in California and Massachusetts who sued over their status as contractors, rather than employees. 。
Keeping drivers as contractors, not eligible for benefits or other protections for full-time workers, has been instrumental in Uber's astronomical growth and business model. Settling class-action lawsuits over the issue for $100 million allowed Uber to move forward with its business model intact.。
The case has also been closely watched in Silicon Valley due to the possibility that the case will impact the broader on-demand economy. 。
But a judge hinted in June that the settlement might not be enough on Uber's part. And on Thursday U.S. District Court Judge Edward Chen rejected the settlement deal. 。
Thanks for signing up!。
Chen cited a prior ruling from the California Labor Commission that said that Uber had to treat a driver as a full-time employee. 。
Uber could be in line for a bigger financial hit as long as the ruling is upheld and the case moves forward. Chen said in his ruling that the $100 million settlement — $16 million of which was projected based on a future IPO from Uber — was not enough. 。
He pointed to a few reasons, noting that he did believe that "the change to tipping policy will result in 'substantially increased income'" that had been promised.。
Chen also noted that the $16 million for the IPO could not be considered a reasonable sum as "there is no information on the likelihood that this contingency will be triggered."。 But it's possible the lawsuit could collapse and Uber would walk away without paying the 385,000 drivers anything, as。 But it's possible the lawsuit could collapse and Uber would walk away without paying the 385,000 drivers anything, as 。
Bloomberg 。
pointed out.。
Uber drivers had previously been under an "arbitration agreement" that meant any lawsuit filed against Uber would be mediated not in a court but rather in arbitration, a private process that is usually quicker and often favors companies.。
Chen threw out the arbitration agreement, allowing the lawsuit to proceed in court. Uber has appealed that decision, and if it wins, could face a far smaller class-action lawsuit. The lawyer for the drivers has said this would be disastrous for their case and give Uber the upper hand. 。
The judge acknowledged that risk, but did not find it strong enough to uphold the settlement.。
"In addition to this risk to maintaining class action status, as this Court has previously noted, Plaintiffs face risks on the merits of the case. The fundamental question of whether Uber drivers are employees or independent contractors is not a simple one," the judge wrote.。
The ruling comes on the same day Uber said it would roll out its first driverless cars in Pittsburgh. And they won't be able to sue.。
When reached for comment, an Uber spokesperson emailed the following statement: "The settlement, mutually agreed by both sides, was fair and reasonable. We’re disappointed in this decision and are taking a look at our options." 。
This post was updated to reflect the new case ruling that may impact the original story.。
This post was updated to reflect the new case ruling that may impact the original story.。
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2025-09-19 14:32
西媒:登貝萊免簽尤文已達協議 巴黎欲重金截殺2025-09-19 14:00
巴薩甩2.8億兩廢將 ?庫鳥或回巴西 熱刺欲購格子2025-09-19 13:41
深圳隊VS亞泰首發:郜林王永珀先發 儒尼奧爾替補2025-09-19 13:24
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town2025-09-19 13:21
體育總局: 國腳嚴禁有新紋身 對已有者勸誡其自行清除2025-09-19 13:07
馬德興:為何海港不欠薪廣州隊卻深陷泥潭 因為不是一種模式2025-09-19 13:03
蔣光太社媒發文慶祝:團隊勝利!大家都很棒 !2025-09-19 12:48
New Zealand designer's photo series celebrates the elegance of aging2025-09-19 12:11
河南隊戰武漢進行人員輪換 年輕球員將獲得出場機會2025-09-19 12:06
Is Samsung's Galaxy Note7 really the best phone?2025-09-19 14:13
河北隊主帥:隊員付出了100%努力 但戰力隻有在蘇州時的60%2025-09-19 14:12
傳奇歸來!切爾西官方 :特裏將擔任球隊青訓教練顧問2025-09-19 13:21
巴媒 :賈爾森因欠薪已和大連人解約 土超豪門對其感興趣2025-09-19 13:18
Researchers create temporary tattoos you can use to control your devices2025-09-19 12:39
深足主帥合約到期最後2輪不帶隊 談無緣亞冠:今年進步明顯2025-09-19 12:35
張外龍:感謝重慶隊員們一直克服困難 希望最終結果是好的2025-09-19 12:33
青島提前一輪確定排名保級組末位 附加賽將戰浙江隊2025-09-19 12:16
Despite IOC ban, Rio crowds get their political messages across2025-09-19 12:12
河北隊VS廣州隊首發:雙外援PK全華班 韋世豪蔣光太出戰2025-09-19 12:06