时间:2025-12-14 17:55:25 来源:网络整理编辑:娛樂
The imminent WeChat ban that was set to remove the app from U.S. app stores on Sunday is going to ha
The imminent WeChat ban that was set to remove the app from U.S. app stores on Sunday is going to have to wait a bit longer. It's a big positive step for an app that has more than a billion users worldwide.
In a Sunday ruling, a U.S. judge in California put the brakes on Donald Trump's executive order from August calling for a WeChat ban (h/t CNBC). The court decision grew out of a lawsuit filed by the U.S. WeChat Users Alliance, following a Friday hearing.
"This is nothing else than a ban," Alliance attorney Michael Bien said in court on Friday, according to the Wall Street Journal. "What matters is our clients' rights to use the app will end on Sunday," he added, referring the the Sept. 20 date for the ban as laid out in Trump's order.
The executive actions were motivated by what Trump described as a national security risk, with Chinese companies – specifically WeChat and TikTok, in this case – potentially having access to American citizens' user data. The order called for control of the data to be handed over to U.S. interests, and that seems to be happening in the case of TikTok.
In the California WeChat case, the federal government maintained that a WeChat ban didn't represent an infringement on the plaintiffs' constitutional rights because there are other apps that provide similar features. But Judge Laurel Beeler, who is presiding over the case, wasn't sold.
SEE ALSO:Trump officially signs an executive order to ban TikTok and WeChat"[T]he court grants the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction on the ground that the plaintiffs have shown serious questions going to the merits of the First Amendment claim, the balance of hardships tips in the plaintiffs' favor, and the plaintiffs establish sufficiently the other elements for preliminary-injunctive relief," the court order reads.
The injunction also blocks a U.S. Commerce Department order that would have prevented U.S. interests from doing business with WeChat. Such a move could have undermined the platform's performance and functioned as a sort of de facto ban.
Neither Trump nor the Commerce Department had commented on Beeler's decision at the time of this writing. But this is a preliminary injunction meant to avoid unnecessary disruptions while the lawsuit unfolds, so the legal struggle is far from over.
TopicsSocial MediaDonald TrumpPolitics
Honda's all2025-12-14 17:49
Bang & Olufsen's new wireless earbuds are improved in every way that matters2025-12-14 17:48
The U.S. government is pressuring Apple to unlock an iPhone. Again.2025-12-14 17:14
If your tax return is pretty basic, H&R Block will help you file it for free2025-12-14 16:02
Balloon fanatic Tim Kaine is also, of course, very good at harmonica2025-12-14 15:57
Where to watch your favorite holiday movies2025-12-14 15:54
Lenovo's Smart Frame puts your digital photos on display without ruining your feng shui2025-12-14 15:52
New Lyft and Uber rules to know for New Year's Day2025-12-14 15:40
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-12-14 15:15
This is the best time in human history. We're designed to think otherwise.2025-12-14 15:15
Michael Phelps says goodbye to the pool with Olympic gold2025-12-14 17:44
Time's Up releases guide to help actors better understand their rights2025-12-14 17:19
Experts skeptical that Facebook Preventive Health will have an impact2025-12-14 17:12
The viral TikTok of a teen eating a 102025-12-14 16:41
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-12-14 16:25
'Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order' review: A terrific and welcome surprise2025-12-14 16:15
Chrissy Teigen's son and Billie Eilish have both been turned into a very familiar meme2025-12-14 15:49
GM takes on Tesla's Gigafactories with $2.3 billion facility in Ohio2025-12-14 15:44
Uber's $100M settlement over drivers as contractors may not be enough2025-12-14 15:38
Thousands told to jump into the ocean as Australia's raging fires approached2025-12-14 15:32