时间：2026-03-20 07:48:40 来源：网络整理编辑：熱點
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2026-03-20 06:46
Infamously toxic gamer gets a second chance after controversy2026-03-20 06:39
#BizChats: Learn the magic behind building meaningful connections2026-03-20 06:18
#BizChats: Learn the magic behind building meaningful connections2026-03-20 06:14
The five guys who climbed Australia's highest mountain, in swimwear2026-03-20 06:09
One man, a 3002026-03-20 05:53
Facebook made a quiet, shady change in response to a rough ‘60 Minutes’ segment2026-03-20 05:49
This fire safety video about smoke alarms is so gloriously odd2026-03-20 05:38
This company is hiring someone just to drink all day2026-03-20 05:30
Instagram is the new Tinder—whether you want it to be or not2026-03-20 05:05
'The Flying Bum' aircraft crashes during second test flight2026-03-20 07:16
Look up to see Uranus this week2026-03-20 06:44
10 great resources for women entrepreneurs2026-03-20 06:43
Horror stories from Weinstein's employees reveal a much larger problem in Hollywood2026-03-20 06:33
Dramatic photo captures nun texting friends after Italy earthquake2026-03-20 06:25
Meet the woman washing the grime off Uber2026-03-20 05:58
Google Clips is designed for privacy, but surveillance worries persist2026-03-20 05:49
Giant red lightsaber flies by Sydney Opera House, thrilling 'Star Wars' fans2026-03-20 05:39
Donald Trump's tangled web of Russian influence2026-03-20 05:31
Dad's tweet about daughter's reaction to a female referee is what we need right now2026-03-20 05:28
