时间:2024-11-21 17:29:37 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2024-11-21 17:27
Taiwanese dog models fruit couture like a pro2024-11-21 16:58
After backlash, NRA responds to Philando Castile shooting, but doesn't say much2024-11-21 16:56
Taylor Swift is the top2024-11-21 16:25
Olympic security asks female Iranian fan to drop protest sign2024-11-21 16:15
Lisa Frank wants to help you relive '90s magic with an adult coloring book2024-11-21 16:02
How the Apple Watch wants to be the first fitness tracker for people in wheelchairs2024-11-21 16:00
Leslie Jones kills it at 'Ghostbusters' premiere in stunning red dress2024-11-21 15:56
Mom discovers security cameras hacked, kids' bedroom livestreamed2024-11-21 15:49
This adorable 62024-11-21 15:12
Aly Raisman catches Simone Biles napping on a plane like a champion2024-11-21 17:28
Chinese fans are really upset that Lady Gaga hung out with the Dalai Lama2024-11-21 17:23
Persuasive 'Game of Thrones' theory predicts an unexpected marriage in Season 72024-11-21 17:20
Dude finds the hysterical 'Spongebob diary' he kept as a kid2024-11-21 17:02
Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news2024-11-21 16:52
Devastating R.I.P. video will make you mourn for Sydney's lost nightlife2024-11-21 16:41
Spending a day on 'Pokémon Go' is not good for your phone's battery life2024-11-21 15:43
Taylor Swift is the top2024-11-21 15:39
Major earthquake and multiple aftershocks rock central Italy2024-11-21 15:37
8 Indigenous Australian films and TV series everyone should watch right now2024-11-21 14:51