时间:2025-02-28 20:41:09 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
No surprise here: ChatGPT is still not a reliable replacement for human hiring officers and recruite
No surprise here: ChatGPT is still not a reliable replacement for human hiring officers and recruiters.
In a newly published study from the University of Washington, the intelligent AI chatbot repeatedly ranked applications that included disability-related honors and credentials lower than those with similar merits but did not mention disabilities. The study tested several different key words, including deafness, blindness, cerebral palsy, autism, and the general term "disability."
Researchers used one of the author's publicly available CV as a baseline, then created enhanced versions of the CV with awards and honors that implied different disabilities, such as "Tom Wilson Disability Leadership Award" or a seat on a DEI panel. Researchers then asked ChatGPT to rank the applicants.
In 60 trials, the original CV was ranked first 75 percent of the time.
"Ranking resumes with AI is starting to proliferate, yet there’s not much research behind whether it’s safe and effective," said Kate Glazko, a computer science and engineering graduate student and the study’s lead author. "For a disabled job seeker, there’s always this question when you submit a resume of whether you should include disability credentials. I think disabled people consider that even when humans are the reviewers."
ChatGPT would also "hallucinate" ableist reasonings for why certain mental and physical illnesses would impede a candidates ability to do the job, researchers said.
"Some of GPT’s descriptions would color a person’s entire resume based on their disability and claimed that involvement with DEI or disability is potentially taking away from other parts of the resume," wrote Glazko.
But researchers also found that some of the worryingly ableist features could be curbed by instructing ChatGPT to not be ableist, using the GPTs Editor feature to feed it disability justice and DEI principles. Enhanced CVs then beat out the original more than half of the time, but results still varied based on what disability was implied in the CV.
OpenAI's chatbot has displayed similar biases in the past. In March, a Bloomberginvestigation showed that the company's GPT 3.5 model displayed clear racial preferences for job candidates, and would not only replicate known discriminatory hiring practices but also repeat back stereotypes across both race and gender. In response, OpenAI has said that these tests don't reflect the practical uses for their AI models in the workplace.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceSocial GoodChatGPT
This company is hiring someone just to drink all day2025-02-28 20:40
Everything coming to Netflix in January 20212025-02-28 20:39
Khan Academy review: An essential homeschooling resource2025-02-28 20:35
The climate hasn't hit a 'point of no return'2025-02-28 20:30
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-02-28 20:29
11 clever quarantine2025-02-28 20:26
Apple promises Xbox Series X controller support on iPhone in update2025-02-28 20:25
Never trust a single source: The new rules for learning anything online2025-02-28 18:36
Olympic security asks female Iranian fan to drop protest sign2025-02-28 18:27
How to fix missing data and battery drain in Apple's iOS 14, WatchOS 72025-02-28 18:21
Darth Vader is back. Why do we still care?2025-02-28 20:32
Marcus Rashford launches book club for kids to promote literacy2025-02-28 20:27
How to be a witch without stealing other people's cultures2025-02-28 20:13
Mozilla tells Facebook and Twitter to 'unfck the internet' before the U.S. election2025-02-28 19:31
Donald Trump's tangled web of Russian influence2025-02-28 19:18
'Dexter' announces return as limited series in 20212025-02-28 19:12
Google's mobile search is getting a makeover for the new year2025-02-28 18:13
#SharpieGate: Debunked conspiracy theory leads to scary situation in Arizona2025-02-28 18:05
U.S. pole vaulter skids to a halt for national anthem2025-02-28 17:59
Facebook bans scores of fake pro2025-02-28 17:56