时间:2025-04-26 18:32:34 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
Facebook numbs us. It's supposed to: As an app and social network, it offers an unending feed of com
Facebook numbs us.
It's supposed to: As an app and social network, it offers an unending feed of comforting memories, photos from friends and updates from trusted brands. ("Not enjoying pooping at work?" Let Charmin help.)
SEE ALSO:Facebook's ideals: As fake as its fakest newsBut we felt a little sting in 2016, when Facebook, despite its best efforts, became political — an institution with far more power than many of us once recognized. It was the bad guy in an era that felt like a dystopic movie.
It plotted to expand its internet service empire, giving us a glimpse into a future when the world's largest social network administers internet access to millions (or billions) rather than ceding control to other providers. It overreacted to reports of bias in its "Trending" news feature and terminated its staff of human editors. Important media was censored on the platform. And Facebook allowed disinformation and viral hoaxes to run amok in the News Feed during a pivotal presidential election.
Let's return to the beginning of this year to examine what went wrong.
Facebook suffered a rebuke in February that would reverberate through the rest of the year. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India struck down Facebook's plans to install its "Free Basics" internet service in the country, which would offer a limited suite of online services to users at no cost.
You can view Free Basics in one of two ways. Perhaps access to the internet has become a human right — as Mark Zuckerberg has suggested — and Free Basics represents a tech corporation stepping ahead of elected officials to better the lot of the disenfranchised.
There is no more precise way of understanding Facebook's ambitions than to "shape [our] internet experience."
Or, maybe Free Basics is a cynical ploy for Facebook to corporatize and limit the open internet — a stepping stone to wide-ranging powers that would dictate how people access and consume information.
"Given that a majority of the population are yet to be connected to the internet," the telecom authority wrote in opposition to Free Basics, "allowing service providers to define the nature of access would be equivalent of letting TSPs (telecom service providers) shape the users’ internet experience."
It's a savvy statement, as there is no more precise way of understanding Facebook's ambitions than to "shape [our] internet experience." Indeed, the social network has alwaysshaped how we experience the internet — information delivered with ruthless efficiency by algorithms, accompanied by a sprinkling of photos, video and other nostalgic ephemera made permanent on its servers.
So, fair or not, Facebook was framed as an empire attempting to control our online experience. (Image-wise, we'd argue it didn't help that Facebook tested a massive "Aquila" drone in July that's designed to fly around planet Earth, beaming internet access down to remote areas.)
Facebook's attempts to mediate an online experience are made explicit in Free Basics — but it's a theme that cropped up time and time again throughout 2016.
Consider the word "control" in Facebook's disastrous handling of the media this year. The company has tried and failed to walk a tightrope between free and moderated expression, and it fell loudly on its ass, over and over again.
A sampling:
Facebook temporarily removed a live broadcast showing the aftermath of Philando Castile's shooting in July. Castile had been shot by police officer Jeronimo Yanez in St. Paul, Minnesota during a traffic stop, and his girlfriend broadcast the following moments via the new "Live" feature. The video had been viewed millions of times and showcased how our smartphones could help keep those in power accountable, so long as the platforms we trust don't interfere.Facebook quickly reinstated the video, blamed a technical glitch for its removal and then patted itself on the back for building "a more open and connected world." The incident reminded us that while Facebook gives us tools to communicate with, anything we create for its platform is subject to "glitches" and moderation. On other words, we operate on the company's terms.
In August, Facebook purged the journalists on its "Trending" news team. Shortly thereafter, fake stories began appearing in the Trending sidebar. Critics had lashed the company earlier this year following reports that those journalists "suppressed" conservative news in the Trending feature and "injected" stories that weren't being widely discussed on the social network. Facebook's response was intended to provide balance by removing any risk of editorializing. Instead, it obfuscated the news by presenting users with useless junk.
In September, Facebook removed an iconic photo from the Vietnam War because it violated its terms of service. When users revolted, the social network reinstated the image and updated its policies.
In November, a report in the New York Timesalleged that Facebook had developed a tool that would help Chinese officials censor information in the News Feed — a cynical move to help the social network gain a foothold in the country. It hasn't been deployed, but you don't need us to tell you why that's bad news.
Throughout 2016, Facebook allowed totally "fake news" to spread to millions of people on its News Feed. (You've no doubt heard.) Opportunists understood they could profit from fabricating stories that supported Donald Trump while damning Hillary Clinton, and Facebook gave them a platform. Obscene stories about Clinton's involvement in a totally invented child sex ring spread like wildfire, arguably influencing the election in November. Facebook said it would address the problem by working with third-party fact checkers in a move that we've characterized as too little, too late.
All of these problems stem from a core idea: Facebook wants to be a product for everyone. It has over a billion users, but to the social network, that means there are 6 billion more to go.
Free Basics is one element of the plan to capture them. The games it plays with its News Feed — making a mess, shrugging off responsibility and haphazardly responding to criticism — are another.
There has never been a communication tool quite like Facebook, and the company only intends for it to grow. Its potential as a force of good almost goes without saying — for all it messed up this year, Facebook also deployed artificial intelligence that could describe photos to blind people, for example.
But if the company's performance in 2016 teaches us anything, it's that the social network's power must be continually examined, because the potential for darkness is no less great.
TopicsFacebook
Florida hurricane forecast remains uncertain, but trends in state's favor2025-04-26 18:30
新疆維納斯辣登MAMA 詭異中式英文嚇人2025-04-26 18:19
“精英”品牌王老吉帶來年味新體驗——這波營銷,太可了 !2025-04-26 18:10
紀李 :成年人不做選擇題 新青年有樣新活法2025-04-26 17:11
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-04-26 17:09
嗖秀樂空降魔盒音樂節 ,助力選手實現音樂夢想2025-04-26 16:51
嗖秀樂空降魔盒音樂節 ,助力選手實現音樂夢想2025-04-26 16:28
康佳與愛奇藝跨界聯合 ,實力開啟“尖叫之夜”2025-04-26 16:04
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town2025-04-26 15:58
電影《封神三部曲》場景細節精致 呈現商周恢弘氣概2025-04-26 15:56
We asked linguists if Donald Trump speaks like that on purpose2025-04-26 18:05
【波盈足球】 世足黑馬摩洛哥1比0勝葡萄牙 非洲球隊破天荒闖入4強 ( 摩洛哥,葡萄牙 )2025-04-26 18:03
泰國達美傾情讚助少兒春晚暨亞洲小姐總決賽 ,展望2020!2025-04-26 18:03
致敬李小龍中印合拍功夫電影《鳳爭虎鬥》新聞發布會2025-04-26 17:49
Daughter gives her 1002025-04-26 17:44
馬晨熙時尚雜誌拍攝 ,粉絲驚呼:我愛的少年已長大2025-04-26 17:24
紀李 :成年人不做選擇題 新青年有樣新活法2025-04-26 17:04
賽製新升級!《主持人大賽》經典節目實戰碰撞出思維火花2025-04-26 17:03
Twitter grants everyone access to quality filter for tweet notifications2025-04-26 16:43
《偶像請回答》專訪·張若昀的戲裏戲外2025-04-26 16:04